How Many People Could Instantly Kill an Unshielded Nuclear Reactor?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the lethal potential of radiation from an unshielded nuclear reactor. It is established that exposure to several tens of thousands of rads can be fatal within one second. Factors influencing this include the radiation source strength, distance, and the type of reactor, with Pressurized Water Reactors (PWRs) exhibiting higher radiation densities than Boiling Water Reactors (BWRs) or Advanced Gas-cooled Reactors (AGRs). The conversation references the Chernobyl accident, highlighting that even under extreme conditions, survival times were limited to minutes due to overwhelming radiation levels.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radiation units such as Grays (Gy) and Rads.
  • Knowledge of nuclear reactor types, specifically PWR, BWR, and AGR.
  • Familiarity with nuclear fission processes and energy release mechanisms.
  • Basic principles of radiation shielding and attenuation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the radiation dose limits for human exposure and their biological effects.
  • Study the differences in radiation emissions between various reactor types, focusing on PWRs and BWRs.
  • Examine historical nuclear accidents, particularly Chernobyl, for insights on radiation exposure outcomes.
  • Learn about radiation shielding materials and their effectiveness in reducing exposure.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for nuclear engineers, health physicists, safety regulators, and anyone involved in nuclear safety and radiation protection.

Numeriprimi
Messages
135
Reaction score
0
I think about an interesting question - How many people can kill unshielded nuclear reactor in one second? Some averages, estimates ... Do you have any idea? And why? On what is it dependent?Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Numeriprimi said:
I think about an interesting question - How many people can kill unshielded nuclear reactor in one second? Some averages, estimates ... Do you have any idea? And why? On what is it dependent?Thanks.
Most reactors have some shielding, if for no other reason than to contain the cooling fluid which is at some pressure above atmospheric pressure. Otherwise, shielding is incorporated in a design precisely to protect persons from radiation exposure, as well as high temperatures.

It would take a high level of radiation to kill a person in one second, perhaps several tens of thousands of rads.

The amount of radiation available depends on the source strength and distance. For a localized source of radation, the dose rate decreases roughly proportional to the distance squared.
 
As the radiation increases so the minutes one has left to live decrease easy as that.
Under normal conditions of operating I think no one would die in a long enough time of measurement.

Look up Chernobyl accident , even though after the blast the reactor was more like a fast reacting nuclear bomb , sources say some persons survived 15 to 20 minutes and then died from the mind blowing amounts of radioactivity that was around the site after the accident and for many days to come.
But those are not normal operating conditions so normally nothing like that happens.
 
As others are saying, it depends heavily on the source term and other things.

For large power reactors, even a handful of fresh fully unshielded fuel bundles can kill in minutes, as they can be well over 1 million Rem/hr (1E4 Sv/hr) on contact. A few feet of water greatly reduces this though, as every foot roughly reduces it by an order of magnitude.
 
it depends on the surface area of your body too, fatter person takes greater radiation than thinner one if he was to stand infront of a radioactive source. For the sake of argument, if someone was to stand in the middle of a nuclear reactor (between fuel rode) which is operating like a normal reactor, a radiation intake for one second is high enough to be considered a lethal dose. (In addition to the parameters that were mentioned by the guys before me the type of the reactor should be considered too when you want to make actual calculations, as a PWR has high radiation density than a BWR or AGR, plus the enrichement of the rods, etc).
 
Dundeephysics said:
For the sake of argument, if someone was to stand in the middle of a nuclear reactor (between fuel rode) which is operating like a normal reactor, a radiation intake for one second is high enough to be considered a lethal dose.

In operating reactor radiation flux is strong enough to generate ~50kW in every kilogram of fuel - after all, the reactor heats up exclusively because of the radiation, nothing else.
50kW is approximately the power of 25 electric kitchen kettles.

A human body in conditions like these would be cooked (as in "boiled meat") in a few seconds.
 
Numeriprimi said:
I think about an interesting question - How many people can kill unshielded nuclear reactor in one second? Some averages, estimates ... Do you have any idea? And why? On what is it dependent?Thanks.

Operating reactors' fuel emits radiation at about 50000 Gy/s = 180 million Grays/hour. A lot of it is absorbed - fission fragmens don't leave fuel pellets, all betas are absorbed, most neutrons are absorbed, many gammas are absorbed - but not all.

And 180 million Gy/h is an enormous number.

20 cm thick steel walls of PWRs attenuate hard gammas ony by about 250 times. The gamma radiation directly at the wall of the operating PWR should be seriously high, and some neutrons will also be there. Stab in the dark: tens of thousands of Grays/h?
 
nikkkom said:
In operating reactor radiation flux is strong enough to generate ~50kW in every kilogram of fuel - after all, the reactor heats up exclusively because of the radiation, nothing else.
50kW is approximately the power of 25 electric kitchen kettles.

A human body in conditions like these would be cooked (as in "boiled meat") in a few seconds.


haha, tell me about it. I was considering nuclear radiation only, that's why I put the first sentence "for the sake of argument" :smile:
 
Dundeephysics said:
haha, tell me about it. I was considering nuclear radiation only

That's what heats up the reactor - radiation. There are no other heat sources.

(It's debatable whether recoiling fission fragments are "radiation", but if fast-moving He-4 nucleus is considered to be a kind of radiation, then they can be too)
 
  • #10
interesting.
 
  • #11
nikkkom said:
That's what heats up the reactor - radiation. There are no other heat sources.

(It's debatable whether recoiling fission fragments are "radiation", but if fast-moving He-4 nucleus is considered to be a kind of radiation, then they can be too)

The Energy that heats up the reactor causes the water (or whatever inside) to evaporate comes mainly from the energy difference between uranium and the fission daughter atoms. The thread initiator I believe is considering radiation from gamma, neutrons, alpha, beta etc and their effect on human. (I actually don't like saying radiation cause gamma, neutrons and alpha are also energy)

Nuclear fission Eq
(235,92)U + (1,0)n-->(A1,Z1)F1 + (A2,Z2)F2 + X(1,0)n+Y+Energy
Where X is an integer, Y is gamma.
 
  • #12
Dundeephysics said:
The Energy that heats up the reactor causes the water (or whatever inside) to evaporate comes mainly from the energy difference between uranium and the fission daughter atoms. The thread initiator I believe is considering radiation from gamma, neutrons, alpha, beta etc and their effect on human. (I actually don't like saying radiation cause gamma, neutrons and alpha are also energy)

Nuclear fission Eq
(235,92)U + (1,0)n-->(A1,Z1)F1 + (A2,Z2)F2 + X(1,0)n+Y+Energy
Where X is an integer, Y is gamma.

And that energy takes multiple forms. Some of it is gamma. The majority of it is kinetic energy from the fission fragments as they are bouncing around after being fissioned.
 
  • #13
Hiddencamper said:
And that energy takes multiple forms. Some of it is gamma. The majority of it is kinetic energy from the fission fragments as they are bouncing around after being fissioned.

Yes. Fission fragments are flying at several % of speed of light, so they are a "radiation" of sorts. And just like other heavy kind of radiation, alpha, they aren't penetrating.

And, yes. Fission fragments' kinetic energy is 90% of total fission energy, gammas and (delayed) betas (and their attendant secondary gammas) are no more than 10% of total released energy.

Even 10% of energy of operating reactor, when expressed as radiation dose, is enormous and far higher than anything survivable even for one second. Heck, even 1% is promptly lethal (it is about 500 Gy = ~50000 rem).
 
  • #14
krash661 said:
interesting.

I find this topic a bit strange. It only makes sense to me if viewed from a "I want to figure out the orders of magnitude of radiation fields in an operating reactor" POV.

The idea of exposing people to such fields, even theoretical, is deeply unfunny. It's akin to asking "how quickly would a human die if thrown into a boiling water?". Stupid.
 
  • #15
Hiddencamper said:
And that energy takes multiple forms. Some of it is gamma. The majority of it is kinetic energy from the fission fragments as they are bouncing around after being fissioned.

in the eq I represented the gamma (Y) on its own, and the Kinetic energy is represented mostly by the energy term.
 
  • #16
nikkkom said:
And, yes. Fission fragments' kinetic energy is 90% of total fission energy, gammas and (delayed) betas (and their attendant secondary gammas) are no more than 10% of total released energy.

That's what I meant, and I believe the question was all about the 10%
 
  • #17
In order to kill in 1 second you'd probably have to have a high enough dose rate to cause massive organ system damage to the heart, nervous system, etc. The threshold dose for nerve damage is about 50 Gy (depending on who you source), and around 40 Gy for damage to the heart, so I imagine 200 Gy in 1 second would instantly kill. Of course, this is just a best guess.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K