How many stars does one create and how many times can stars be

  • Thread starter Thread starter decay33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
AI Thread Summary
The number of stars created from a nebula depends on its mass and the stellar initial mass function (IMF), which indicates that low-mass stars are more common than high-mass stars. The IMF's universality is still debated, as it may vary across different regions. Star recycling is possible as long as the interstellar medium is enriched with materials from dying stars, allowing for ongoing star formation. However, processes like gravitational interactions and galaxy mergers can deplete gas resources, halting star formation and leading to "old, red, and dead" galaxies. Overall, the dynamics of star creation and recycling are influenced by both the initial conditions and subsequent cosmic events.
decay33
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How many stars does one create and how many times can stars be recycled into more stars?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org


decay33 said:
How many stars does one create

It depends on the nebula and on the masses of the stars that are produced. The stars in a new population usually end up following a statistical distribution of masses called the stellar initial mass function (IMF). I'd recommend looking it up. There are different proposed IMFs, but they all share the property that you get more low-mass stars than high-mass ones (i.e. high mass stars are rare). It's still unclear whether the IMF is universal or whether it differs from place to place. But either way, it's a statistical thing. Obviously a given individual nebula cannot produce any really high-mass stars if there isn't enough raw material present to produce even one (even if the IMF predicts there should be some number of them at that mass).

decay33 said:
and how many times can stars be recycled into more stars?

This is a complex topic. I think that as long as the interstellar medium (the gaseous matter in between the stars in a galaxy) continues to be enriched by new raw materials from dying stars, then star formation can continue. But I do know that there are processes that can stop star formation in galaxies (which is called "quenching"). In particular, tidal/gravitational interactions between galaxies (collisions, mergers etc) can strip the gas out of the galaxies involved and therefore remove all of the raw materials necessary for continued star formation. (Particularly if all of the high-mass, short-lived stars are gone, and all that remains are low mass, long-lived ones that are never going to go supernova and aren't going to end their lives for a very very long time, longer than the present age of the universe). Such galaxies are sometimes referred to as being, "old, red, and dead", and almost all elliptical galaxies are like this. They have all stars and no gas.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top