How many ways can you arrange 52 things into 4 groups BUT th

Wmwhite9
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How many ways can you arrange 52 things into 4 groups BUT the groups do not have to be the same size?!?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the things are distinguishable and the groups are distinguishable and a group can be zero size and the order within a group doesn't matter, ##4^{52}##.
 
Wmwhite9 said:
How many ways can you arrange 52 things into 4 groups BUT the groups do not have to be the same size?!?
If I understood correctly, this is the problem of balls in boxes, where you want to put 52 objects in 4 boxes. If the things are indistinguishable, then the answer is the solution to ## x_1+x_2+x_3+x_4=52 ## , which is equal to ## (n+k-1)C(k-1) ## , where ##C## stands for "choose", as in " x choose k":= ##\frac {x!}{k!(x-k)!} ## .
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top