MHB How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nari
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the number of ways to draw 3 cards of one suit and 2 cards of another from a standard 52-card deck, the calculation involves three components: C(13, 3) for choosing 3 cards from one suit, C(13, 2) for choosing 2 cards from another suit, and C(4, 2) for selecting which two suits to use. The last component is crucial because it accounts for the different suit combinations, ensuring that combinations like 3 hearts and 2 spades are distinguished from 3 spades and 2 hearts. The initial calculations do not specify suits, hence the need for the additional factor. Understanding this distinction clarifies the overall counting method.
nari
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi! I am completing a practice exam and there is this answer to a question that I do not understand. It says:

An experiment consists of drawing a hand of 5 cards from a standard deck of 52 cards. How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

I thought it was C(13, 3) x C(13,2). But it turns out it is C(13, 3) x C(13,2) x C(4,2). I don't understand where that last bit comes from. I know there are 4 suits, so I am guessing that bit is choosing two suits out of the four, but why is that not redundant when considering the first two parts of the answer?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
nari said:
Hi! I am completing a practice exam and there is this answer to a question that I do not understand. It says:

An experiment consists of drawing a hand of 5 cards from a standard deck of 52 cards. How many ways can you draw 3 of one suit and 2 of another suit?

I thought it was C(13, 3) x C(13,2). But it turns out it is C(13, 3) x C(13,2) x C(4,2). I don't understand where that last bit comes from. I know there are 4 suits, so I am guessing that bit is choosing two suits out of the four, but why is that not redundant when considering the first two parts of the answer?

Hi nari,

Welcome to MHB. :) This is a good question!

The first two parts, C(13, 3) x C(13,2), deal with choosing select cards from a pool in the appropriate way, but say nothing about the suit. For the first term, C(13, 3), this could be any of the 4 suits right? And then for the second expression, C(13,2), this could be from any of the 3 remaining suits. We haven't dealt with the problem of where the 13's come from yet. We are counting 3H2S the same as 3S2D right now.

That's where this last piece comes in. Does that make sense or help?
 
Jameson said:
Hi nari,

Welcome to MHB. :) This is a good question!

The first two parts, C(13, 3) x C(13,2), deal with choosing select cards from a pool in the appropriate way, but say nothing about the suit. For the first term, C(13, 3), this could be any of the 4 suits right? And then for the second expression, C(13,2), this could be from any of the 3 remaining suits. We haven't dealt with the problem of where the 13's come from yet. We are counting 3H2S the same as 3S2D right now.

That's where this last piece comes in. Does that make sense or help?

Yes, it does make sense! Thank you :)
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top