How Many Ways Can You Roll Six Dice with Repeating Numbers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArcanaNoir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dice Probability
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the number of ways to roll six dice with varying conditions of repeated numbers. Participants suggest starting with simpler cases, such as rolling two dice with the same number, to build understanding. The concept of negation is introduced to simplify the problem, focusing on outcomes where numbers are different. Various strategies, including tabling possibilities and using combinatorial formulas, are discussed to tackle cases of at least two, three, four, and five identical numbers. The conversation highlights the complexity of probability calculations and the importance of breaking down the problem into manageable parts.
  • #31
I like Serena said:
No, you allow the 4th die to be the same as the 3rd die here (you didn't before!)

And also for the 5th and 6th die to be the same as one of the other dies.

That's not right.

But vela said it was wrong to say the fourth could NOT the same as the fifth or sixth. :cry:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
XX YZWV

X any: 6/6
X the same: 1/6
Y different from X: 5/6
Z different from X and Y: 4/6
W ...
V
 
  • #33
I like Serena said:
No, you allow the 4th die to be the same as the 3rd die here (you didn't before!)

And also for the 5th and 6th die to be the same as one of the other dies.

That's not right.

Okay I see that for exactly 2 to be the same If I let the last four be whatever they might be more than 2 the same among themselves. so what do I do?
 
  • #34
what if I have 2,2,3,3,4,5,6? Is that allowed as "exactly 2 numbers the same"?
 
  • #35
ArcanaNoir said:
But vela said it was wrong to say the fourth could NOT the same as the fifth or sixth. :cry:

Ah, I see, vela was using it differently than I was.
Sorry. :blushing:
 
  • #36
I like Serena said:
Ah, I see, vela was using it differently than I was.
Sorry. :blushing:

So now what?
 
  • #37
I just realized why vela suggested to start from the other side, but we're not there yet to see why this is the case.
We can continue the way I was going, and show you where things get complex.
But in retrospect I think it's better to first get the solution with as little confusion as possible.

So let's follow vela's pattern of exactly 4 the same and the other 2 as don't care.
That is: XXXX YZ or XXXX YY.

How many possibilities did you have for that?
 
  • #38
(6/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(5/6)
 
  • #39
Next is the PEPPER analogy.

How many ways can you shuffle the letters XXXXYZ?
Note that these are different outcomes, but all have exactly 4 the same dice.
 
  • #40
6!/4! ?
 
  • #41
ArcanaNoir said:
6!/4! ?

Yes.

However, we still need to distinguish XXXXYZ and XXXXYY.
Do you know how many ways you can shuffle XXXXYY?

The chance on exactly 4 the same would be:
(number of ways to shuffle XXXXYZ) x P(XXXXYZ) + (number of ways to shuffle XXXXYY) x P(XXXXYY).
 
Last edited:
  • #42
(6/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(4/6)= 5/1944
(6/6)(1/6)(1/6)(1/6)(5/6)(1/6)=5/7776

\frac{(6!)(5)}{(4!)(1944)}+\frac{(6!)(5)}{(4!)(2!)(7776)}= \frac{25}{288}
 
  • #43
You've got it! :smile:

Now you can find the chance of "at least 4 the same" by summing this with "exactly 5 the same" and "all the same".
 
  • #44
Thanks.
Just to be sure,
for exactly 3 the same would it be:
(shuffle XXXYYZ)(PXXXYYZ)+(Shuffle XXXYYY)(PXXXYYY)+(Shuffle XXXYZW)(PXXXYZW)?
 
  • #45
(Going out to fix the mailbox with Dad now, don't wait for any more replies from me for a lil while)
 
  • #46
ArcanaNoir said:
Thanks.
Just to be sure,
for exactly 3 the same would it be:
(shuffle XXXYYZ)(PXXXYYZ)+(Shuffle XXXYYY)(PXXXYYY)+(Shuffle XXXYZW)(PXXXYZW)?

Yep! :smile:


ArcanaNoir said:
(Going out to fix the mailbox with Dad now, don't wait for any more replies from me for a lil while)

Thanks for telling me so I won't wait unnecessarily for another post. :approve:
 
  • #47
Great, thanks for all the help!

I still hate probability. :devil:
 
  • #48
ArcanaNoir said:
Great, thanks for all the help!

I still hate probability. :devil:

In retrospect, we might as well have done the "exactly 2" case, seeing how easily you finished the exercise, once you knew what to do. :wink:
 
  • #49
I like Serena said:
In retrospect, we might as well have done the "exactly 2" case, seeing how easily you finished the exercise, once you knew what to do. :wink:

Seeing how easily I finished the exercise, once I knew what to do, I wish you could have just told me what to do in the first place. Maybe I'll remember better since we did it this way, but sometimes PF makes me want to bang my head against the wall!
 
  • #50
ArcanaNoir said:
sometimes PF makes me want to bang my head against the wall!
Our work here is done.
 
  • #51
ArcanaNoir said:
Seeing how easily I finished the exercise, once I knew what to do, I wish you could have just told me what to do in the first place. Maybe I'll remember better since we did it this way, but sometimes PF makes me want to bang my head against the wall!

Any suggestions?

Is there something that might better have been done differently?
I'm still trying to learn as well how to do these things. :shy:

Although I do secretly derive some pleasure of the image seeing you banging your head. o:)
I guess it compensates for the times I was banging my head myself.
 
  • #52
Something's wrong. :( When I applied the technique of (shuffle)(Prob)+... to all the dice are different, I got:

(Shuffle abcdef)(Probabcdef)= (6!)(6/6)(5/6)(4/6)(3/6)(2/6)(1/6) = 100/9

Which is clearly not right. What's up?
 
  • #53
ArcanaNoir said:
Something's wrong. :( When I applied the technique of (shuffle)(Prob)+... to all the dice are different, I got:

(Shuffle abcdef)(Probabcdef)= (6!)(6/6)(5/6)(4/6)(3/6)(2/6)(1/6) = 100/9

Which is clearly not right. What's up?

Ah, yes, I'd forgotten about that. Sorry. :blushing:

Your formula for PEPPER was not complete yet.
It only works because the number of P's is different from the E's and the R.

In your current case you already have all the possible combinations, so the shuffle factor should be "1".
To understand this, look only at the first 2 dice.
The combinations (3,4) and (4,3) are both covered by your calculation.
So there are no extra combinations to be found by shuffling.

The same holds true in the pattern XXXXYZ.
I gave you the wrong number before. Sorry.
The proper formula for XXXXYZ is: 6! / [(4!1!1!)(2!)]
The extra 2! in the denominator is because Y and Z can be exchanged, finding a pattern that you have already counted.
The formula for XXXXYY is still: 6! / (4!2!).

In the case XXXWYZ it is: 6! / [(3!1!1!1!)(3!)]
In the case XXXYYZ it is: 6! / [(3!2!1!)]
In the case XXXYYY it is: 6! / [(3!3!)(2!)], because you can interchange X and Y and find the same pattern.
 
  • #54
So the shuffle formula is (number of spaces!)/(number of identical objects! x number of "unique" objects!)?

For example, Shuffle TENNESSEE would be (9!)/(1!4!2!2! x 4!)?

That's not right I think. Can you explain further the shuffling?
 
  • #55
TENNESSEE would be (9!)/(1!4!2!2! x 2!)
Since there are two objects (NN and SS) with equal length.

AAABBBCCCDDEEFF would be (15!)/(3!3!3!2!2!2! x 3!3!),
since there are 3 objects of length AAA and 3 objects of length DD.
 
  • #56
Okay, thanks. :)
 
  • #57
So.. I still can't get the right answer for "all dice different" using the shuffling. It's supposed to be (720)/(46656)

I did: (shuffle ABCDEF)(P ABCDEF) = [(6!)/(1!1!1!1!1!1!6!)](6/6)(5/6)(4/6)(3/6)(2/6)(1/6) = 5/324
 
  • #58
Errr... how are they different? :confused:
 
  • #59
OMG I don't understand how that could have happened. My calculator ALWAYS reduces. Thank you. I'm going to go cry now...

[edit] I know how it happened. This was actually part "a" of the same problem and I wrote it down un-reduced because a number of the solutions in the back of the book are written unreduced. This was yesterday, by today, I forgot I did it that way.

BTW, thank you VERY much for the shuffling explanations, that's going to stick with me a long time, and it wasn't in the book or the notes like that. Just PEPPER. Totally useless to have such a specific example and not even know it shouldn't be generalized without extra information.
 
  • #60
I'm afraid the formula is usually not included in course material.
And actually it's pretty hard to write it down properly.
Afterward it's a puzzle again to decipher it.
If you keep it, make sure you also list a lot of examples on how to use it (more than just PEPPER).

And please don't hold your breath before you forget it again. :wink:
I did! :blushing:

I appreciate the thanks. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K