How Much Do We Know About Cell Complexity?

  • Thread starter Thread starter nameta9
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Cell complexity is highlighted by the fact that even the simplest cells contain around 5,000 proteins and numerous interrelated chemical reactions. Current research indicates that only about 12% of these proteins have been identified based on human genome data, suggesting a long way to go in understanding cellular processes. The field of proteomics aims to rapidly characterize the entire proteome, but it may take centuries to fully determine all proteins experimentally. Additionally, proteins are not the sole contributors to cell function; nucleic acids like DNA and RNA also play critical roles, including enzymatic activity and gene regulation. Overall, while we have made progress, the complexity of cellular biology remains largely unexplored.
nameta9
Messages
184
Reaction score
0
The simplest cell is made up of I think 5000 proteins and an equivalent number of chemical reactions all interlaced and interacting. It is very complex, exactly how much do we know at this point of all these reactions and how they interact ? Thanks for any information.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
One place to start your research on this question is a little light
reading of some books on biochemistry. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
nameta9 said:
The simplest cell is made up of I think 5000 proteins

based upon human genome data, we have only identified around 12% of the proteins in the cell. we have only scratched the surface on understanding many biological processes.

at the current rate, it will be several hundred years before all of the proteins in the cell have experimentally been determined.

on the other hand, it seems unlikely that there would exist biomolecules vastly different than what we know of already (amino acids, sugars, etc.).

the promise of proteomics is to identify and characterize the entire proteome rapidly through the use of technology. only time will tell if this occurs.
 
To add more to the complexitiy of the "simplest" cell we must also take into account the fact that proteins are not the only biomolecules that contribute to the workings of the cell. Nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) have been shown to participate in enzymatic activity (ribozymes) as well as have roles in gene regulation.
 
nameta9 said:
The simplest cell is made up of I think 5000 proteins

The simplest organism has 536 predicted proteins.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=genomeprj&cmd=Retrieve&dopt=Overview&list_uids=9599

However, it is an obligate symbiont.

the simplest non-obligate bacteria and archea would have between 1000 to 2000 predicted proteins. These organisms have a restricted metabolism and narrow range of ecological niche.

In other hand, bacteria with more than 4000 (E. coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are good example) will have a more complex and wider array of metabolism. These also can occupy a wide range of ecological niche.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...

Similar threads

Back
Top