How Much Force to Apply When Doubling the Distance of a Mass on a Stick?

AI Thread Summary
When holding a massless stick with a mass at distance d, moving the mass to 2d requires a greater force to maintain stability. The initial thought was that the force needed would double, but the teacher indicated it must quadruple due to the increase in rotational inertia, as torque must balance the gravitational force acting on the mass. The confusion arises from understanding how torque is generated at the point of force application. The discussion highlights the importance of considering both torque and rotational inertia when calculating the necessary force. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards needing to apply four times the original force to keep the stick stable.
The_Journey
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You're holding a massless stick with a mass (m) on it at a distance (d) from your hand. You move the mass to 2d from your hand, how much larger force do you have to apply with your hand to keep the stick stable if the force you were applying before was F?

Homework Equations


Torque = r cross F.
Torque = Rotational inertia * angular acceleration

The Attempt at a Solution



Since you have to apply the same torque as gravity is on the mass, it should be twice the force because:
r * (2F) = (2r) * F.

But my teacher said since Rotational Inertia = m * (r)^2, the force you have to apply have to be 4 times as before because m * (2d) ^ 2 is 4 times as the rotational inertia before.

Can any1 tell me if it's twice or quadruple, with work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. How do you hold a massless stick with weight at one end with just one hand? With origin at the point of application of F. there is just the reaction of the normal force(=mg) on the stick. Unbalanced?
 
aim1732 said:
I don't understand your question. How do you hold a massless stick with weight at one end with just one hand? With origin at the point of application of F. there is just the reaction of the normal force(=mg) on the stick. Unbalanced?

Like a ruler or a meter stick. Except the distance is d. You're holding the stick at the end without the weight. The weight is on the stick. You're applying a force with your hand to create a torque that is equal but opposite to the torque created by gravity on the other end so the stick would not rotate. My question is just that if you move the weight further, like to 2d, would you have to double or quadruple the force you were holding with before? My initial thought was that you have to double the force, but my teacher said you have to quadruple so I'm kinda confused.
 
I pretty much understood that. My point is that with origin at the point of application of force the force due to the mass has an unbalanced torque (the force you apply has no torque about its own point of application so no amount of force can make the rod stable).
 
Wait, I forgot that a finger like an index finger is making a fulcrum at a distance d1 from your thumb, so your thumb is applying the force downward for the torque. The mass is at d2 from the fulcrum.
 
Well even I could be wrong. Just make sure you tell me if you find out more about it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top