How Much Na2S2O3 Is Needed for Titration in This Redox Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Maharg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Redox Titration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the amount of Na2S2O3 needed for titration in a redox reaction involving bleaching powder and iodide. The reaction equation indicates that 1 mole of I2 reacts with 2 moles of Na2S2O3. The user initially calculated the moles of Cl- from the bleaching powder sample but questioned their method regarding the percentage of Cl that participates in the reaction. They explored different approaches to determine the correct moles of Cl- and I2, expressing confusion about how to account for the chlorine content in the bleaching powder. The conversation highlights the complexity of the calculations and the need for clarity in interpreting the problem statement.
Maharg
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Bleaching powder, Ca(OCl)Cl, reacts with iodide in acidic medium according to the equation:

OCl– + 2 I– + 2 H3O– ---> I2 + Cl– + 3 H2O

How many millilitres of 0.0645 M Na2S2O3 are required to titrate the iodine liberated from a 0.6028 g sample of bleaching powder containing 10.50 % (w/w) Cl ?

Homework Equations



I2 + 2S203 --> 2I- + S4O6

The Attempt at a Solution



I have already submitted an answer for this assignment, and this was one of only 2 questions I got wrong, we can do a second submission so I went to figure this one out.

I think this is where I went wrong.

I Figured out the Cl- moles by: g Cl/0.6028 g = 0.01050

0.063294 g Cl / 35.453 g/mol = 1.78529 mmol

I think I may have done that wrong, but from that.
From mol Cl- I used 1:1 ratio of original reaction to get mol I2

Mol I2 in second reaction are 1/2 mol S203

mol S2O3 = 3.57058641 mmol

Then calculated mL needed.

V = 3.57058641 mmol/0.0645 M
= 55.4 mL

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None :wink:

I got 55.3 mL, close enough.
 
Hm.. that's odd then. The computer usually gives part marks when we're close.
 
Hm, could be we are both wrong. It is 10.5% of Ca(OCl)Cl. Part of the chlorine is not taking part in the iodine oxidation. I have concentrated on your solution, instead of reading the question
 
Would I just divide it by 2? So only 1/2(1.785 mmol Cl) take place in the reaction?
 
Ah, possibly I'm going about it the wrong way, can I instead just avoid the w/w of Cl?

0.6028 g / MW Cl-/ MW Ca(OCl)Cl = mol Cl-

Does anyone know, I'm really lost in the solution.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top