How Much Power Does a Cyclist Develop Climbing a Slope with Resistance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mjpcampbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Motion Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the power developed by a cyclist climbing a slope with resistance. A cyclist with a total mass of 85 kg is riding at a steady speed of 4.0 m/s up a slope that rises 1.0 m for every 20 m. The key challenge is determining the work done against gravity and the constant resistance of 20 N. Participants suggest using trigonometry to find the angle of the slope and calculating the time taken to traverse the hypotenuse to solve for power. The correct power output, as stated in the textbook, is 250 W, highlighting the importance of combining kinetic and potential energy in the calculations.
Mjpcampbell
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A man of mass 70kg rides a bicycle of mass 15kg at a steady speed of 4.0 ms-1 up a road which rises 1.0m for every 20m of its length. What power is the cyclist developing if there is a constant resistance to motion of 20 N? Take g as 10 ms-2 if necessary.

(The answer given in the book is 2.5x102W)


Homework Equations



power = work done/time taken
work done = force x distance moved in direction of force = force x velocity
w= mg


The Attempt at a Solution


I really can't get anywhere with this one after about 45 mins. I know I will kick myself. At first I made an attempt to find the angle of the slop using trigonometry and got a value of 2.9 degrees but this got me nowhere. I'm pretty sure I need to multiply the combined mass of 85 kg by the 1m rise in order to find the value of the work done against gravity. 85 x 10 = 850 N. I tried constructing a right-angled triangle with a hypotenuse of 20m and gave the side with a 1m rise a value of 850 N. But again this got me nowhere. I think the problem is calculating the force on the flat when the cyclist is traveling at 4ms-1 but I don't know how to do this in order to add that value onto the vertical component. My humble, frazzled brain could use some assistance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure if this is correct but I'll throw it out there, maybe someone else can help justify or disprove this claim.

I think the right angle triangle approach would work. You know he's traveling at a constant speed and you know the height he rises over a given distance.

All the work as he travels across the hypotenuse of this triangle will be a summation of kinetic energy and potential energy. Now solve for the time it takes the rider to travel up the hypotenuse of the triangle and hopefully you'll generate the correct answer.

Again I haven't done any of the calculations so I could be wrong, just thought I'd throw it out there.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top