How much studying is enough for persuing TF

  • Thread starter Thread starter Phycisists
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Studying
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a 17-year-old who has shifted focus from computer gaming to studying physics, particularly theoretical physics, dedicating 6-10 hours daily to this pursuit. The individual is using a basic physics textbook that covers fundamental topics, including Newton's laws, thermodynamics, and relativity, and is questioning the value of this study approach and whether to transition to more advanced theoretical physics texts. Responses emphasize that while the current study plan is commendable, it is crucial to balance study time to avoid burnout. Recommendations include focusing on mastering calculus and foundational physics concepts before advancing. Engaging in self-study is encouraged, but participants stress the importance of formal education in physics at the college level. Additionally, participants suggest utilizing online resources and practicing problem-solving to enhance understanding. Overall, the consensus is that a solid grasp of basic physics and mathematics is essential for aspiring theoretical physicists.
Phycisists
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I'm 17 years old and I've recently quitted computer gaming and pursued a secondary interest which is physics in general (mostly Theoretical physics).

I'm studying 6-10 hours a day physics (if it is not a school day) and the particular book I'm using is including these chapters:

1. The physics world.
2. Phycisists view of the world.
3. Movement.
4. Newtons laws.
5. Energy.
6: A chapter about momentum and impulse laws.
7. Thermodynamics/thermophysics.
8. Climate and weather.
9. Electricity.
10. The modern physics progression.
11. Nuclear physics.
12. Relativity and the standardmodell.

My question is, is it worth studying these chapters? It's on a basic level as I'm currently in HS right now. Also is it enough to study 6-10 hours a day with physics? I really do want to become a theoretical phycisist. Or is it simply enough too little of study time?

I can rush through one chapter in maybe 12 - 20 hours, should I just buy a book about theoretical physics instead of working through this one or is it essential that I gather the superficial knowledge this one has to offer me (not very superficial as there's many complex questions)?

Also I do usually have trouble knowing the correct answer to a question so I look it through the internet to learn about it, is this a common problem for you? And how do I overcome that habit?

Sorry for bombarding this post with questions.

//DM
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Being a theoretical physicist is an awesome goal! I would say studying that much independently while still in high school is a great start and that the books you listed cover topics that you will need to master on your path towards your goal. Make sure to be studying lots of mathematics as well as physics!

You are 17 so I assume you will be starting your senior year of high school, you should start researching undergraduate universities with physics programs. I would recommend finding a school that emphasizes undergraduate research programs, as they are very helpful for getting into graduate school.

The main thing you need to realize is that the path to becoming a theoretical physicist is a long and challenging one. If you are completely knew to physics, you should definitely start off by studying Newtons laws and working out problems from a textbook. Once you master Calculus and Newtons laws you'll have completed the first step on your quest! Good luck!
 
Phycisists said:
Hello everyone,

I'm 17 years old and I've recently quitted computer gaming and pursued a secondary interest which is physics in general (mostly Theoretical physics).

I'm studying 6-10 hours a day physics (if it is not a school day) and the particular book I'm using is including these chapters:

1. The physics world.
2. Phycisists view of the world.
3. Movement.
4. Newtons laws.
5. Energy.
6: A chapter about momentum and impulse laws.
7. Thermodynamics/thermophysics.
8. Climate and weather.
9. Electricity.
10. The modern physics progression.
11. Nuclear physics.
12. Relativity and the standardmodell.

My question is, is it worth studying these chapters? It's on a basic level as I'm currently in HS right now. Also is it enough to study 6-10 hours a day with physics? I really do want to become a theoretical phycisist. Or is it simply enough too little of study time?

I can rush through one chapter in maybe 12 - 20 hours, should I just buy a book about theoretical physics instead of working through this one or is it essential that I gather the superficial knowledge this one has to offer me (not very superficial as there's many complex questions)?

Also I do usually have trouble knowing the correct answer to a question so I look it through the internet to learn about it, is this a common problem for you? And how do I overcome that habit?

Sorry for bombarding this post with questions.

//DM

What theoretical physics? The term itself means nothing without some context.

Studying 6-10 hours a day is a good way to burn yourself out. If you're up to speed on calculus you should look into the freshman calculus based physics series. Mechanics -> EM -> Modern.
 
Student100 said:
What theoretical physics? The term itself means nothing without some context.

Studying 6-10 hours a day is a good way to burn yourself out. If you're up to speed on calculus you should look into the freshman calculus based physics series. Mechanics -> EM -> Modern.

One is notburntout if it is done fore pleasure.
 
Hi Phycisists -

If you want to become a physicist, there is one sure path: study physics in college. Read Zapper's thread:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=240792

At your age, focus on math - especially algebra and trigonometry. Practice problems until you are really comfortable and competent.

Self-study is fine, but it will only get you so far, IMO. Good luck!
 
Phycisists said:
I'm studying 6-10 hours a day physics (if it is not a school day) and the particular book I'm using is including these chapters:

1. The physics world.
2. Physicists' view of the world.
3. Movement.
4. Newtons laws.
5. Energy.
6: A chapter about momentum and impulse laws.
7. Thermodynamics/thermophysics.
8. Climate and weather.
9. Electricity.
10. The modern physics progression.
11. Nuclear physics.
12. Relativity and the standard modell.
It's good to start with an overview, since physics is a broad field covering numerous natural phenomena.

One can be a theoretical, experimental and/or applied physicist in areas as diverse as astronomy and astrophysics, plasma physics, nuclear physics, high energy particle physics, quantum mechanics, condensed matter physics, mechanics/dynamics, thermodynamics, hydrodynamics, optics (including lasers), electromagnetism, . . . .


Follow lisab's recommendation.

And browse PF.

Also, Hyperphysics (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/hph.html) is a good reference, as are the two physics societies.

www.aip.org
www.aps.org
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top