How Much Water Must Flow Over the Grand Coulee Dam to Generate 2000 MW of Power?

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamkristing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power River Work
AI Thread Summary
To generate 2000 MW of power from the Grand Coulee Dam, accounting for a 92% efficiency, the total power needed from the water is approximately 2173.91 MW. The gravitational potential energy change for 1 cubic meter of water falling 170 meters is calculated using the formula for potential energy. By dividing the total power required by the energy per cubic meter, the necessary flow rate in cubic meters per second can be determined. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying physics equations to solve for the flow rate. Understanding the relationship between power, efficiency, and energy is crucial for solving this problem effectively.
iamkristing
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] work and power

Homework Statement



the Grand Coulee Dam on the Columbia River is 1270 m long and 170 m high. The electrical power output from the generators at its base is approximately 2000 MW, How many cubic meters of water much flow from the top of the dam per second to produce this amount of power if 92% of the work done on the water by gravity is converted to electrical energy? (Each cubic meter of water has a mass of 1000kg)

Homework Equations



W=kf-ki=1/2mv^2
W=F*deltax*costheta
P=W/deltaT
F=m*a

The Attempt at a Solution



I attempted solving this problem using unknowns since I did not know another way to approach it. so I said

F=m(9.8)
W=m(9.8)(170 m) (costheta)
then I plugged Work into the Power equation:

P=[(m(9.8)(170 m) (costheta))/deltaT](.92)

and I multiplied the whole equation by .92 for the 92% in the problem

Now it seems that the only known in the problem is Power. I could solve for mass using the unknowns of time and theta, but I feel like that is the wrong approach and am not sure how to solve otherwise.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to be making it a lot more difficult than it is.

You know that you get 2000 MW of electrical power, but that the generators are only 92% efficient. So firstly you need to divide that power figure by 0.92 and multiply by 1000000 to get the power of the water in W.

Next up, calculate the change in gravitational potential energy for 1 m^3 of water falling 170m (the height of the damn).

Then it's just division to get the number of m^3 / second of water required to generate that power.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top