How Much Work is Done by a Spring on a Sliding Ladle?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the work done by a spring on a ladle sliding on a frictionless surface. At the equilibrium position, the spring does no work on the ladle, resulting in a power output of 0 watts. When the spring is compressed by 0.10 m, the force exerted by the spring is calculated to be 49 N. The work done by the spring at this compression, as the ladle moves away from the equilibrium, is determined to be 4.9 J, though it may be negative due to the direction of force. Understanding the relationship between force, distance, and work is crucial in this context.
bikerboi92
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Ladle Attached to Spring A 0.23 kg ladle sliding on a horizontal frictionless surface is attached to one end of a horizontal spring (with k = 490 N/m) whose other end is fixed. The mass has a kinetic energy of 10 J as it passes through its equilibrium position (the point at which the spring force is zero).

(a) At what rate is the spring doing work on the ladle as the ladle passes through its equilibrium position?

i got this correct: 0 watts

(b) At what rate is the spring doing work on the ladle when the spring is compressed 0.10 m and the ladle is moving away from the equilibrium position?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bikerboi92 said:
(b) At what rate is the spring doing work on the ladle when the spring is compressed 0.10 m and the ladle is moving away from the equilibrium position?

First you must find the force in the spring at x=.1m which can be found through the equation F=kx. Therefore, the force will be 49N. Then you know that WORK=FORCE*DISTANCE. Therefore W=(49N)*(.1m)=4.9J. This should be correct, though it might be negative.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top