How optical axis is related to dielectric tensor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the optical axis direction of a crystal and the dielectric constants in anisotropic materials. It explains how to derive a specific expression using curl relations for electric (E) and magnetic (H) fields, assuming plane wave propagation. The transformation of the right-hand side of the equation involves using relationships between permeability (μ), electric displacement (D), and permittivity (ε). The final expression is obtained by substituting the wave vector (k) and comparing both sides of the equation. A note is made that the presence of μ on the left side of the equation may violate dimensional consistency.
AAS
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I want to know the relationship between the optical axis direction of a crystal and the dielectric constants in different directions in an anisotropic material.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AAS said:
Thank you
Capture.PNG
Can you please explain how the first expression formed?
 
From the curl relations for E and H and the assumption that the propagating fields are of plane waves, one can obtain
$$
\begin{aligned}
\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{E} = \omega \mu \mathbf{H} \\
\mathbf{k}\times \mathbf{H} = -\omega \mathbf{D}
\end{aligned}
$$
Combining these will yield ##\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{E})-k^2\mathbf{E} = -\omega^2 \mu \mathbf{D}##. Then use the relations like ##\mu = 1/(c^2\epsilon_0)##, ##\mathbf{D} = \epsilon \mathbf{E}##, and ##\epsilon = \epsilon_r\epsilon_0## to transform the RHS into ##-\frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\epsilon_r\mathbf{E}##. So now,
$$
\mathbf{k} (\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{E})-k^2\mathbf{E} = -\frac{\omega^2}{c^2}\epsilon_r\mathbf{E}
$$
Then substitute ##\mathbf{k} = \frac{\omega}{c}n\mathbf{s}## to eliminate ##\omega## in both sides. By taking element-by-element comparison between right and left sides you should see this expression leads to what is written in that slide.
NOTE: I don't think there should be ##\mu## in the LHS of the equation in the slide as its presence will violate the requirement that the LHS and RHS should have the same dimensions.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top