How powerful would super jump shoes have to be?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ForumFire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jump
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "super jump shoes" that could propel a person upwards using powerful magnets. The idea involves using like ends of magnets that, when locked together, can be released to create a repelling force for jumping. The required power of the magnets would depend on the desired height of the jump, with a specific example given of pushing an 80kg person up 0.33m. Participants are curious about the mechanics and feasibility of such a device, emphasizing its potential as a fun toy rather than a practical transportation solution. Overall, the conversation explores the physics behind creating a powerful propulsion system for jumping.
ForumFire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
how powerful would "super jump shoes" have to be?

I was just wondering, if there were "super jump shoes", that would hit on the ground and would propell you upwards, how powerful would those shoes have to be?

I was hoping that you could use poweful magnets to do it. If you put like ends of two magnets together, lock them in place, and when you would be ready to jump unlock them so they would repel, how powerful would the magnets have to be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


The force needed depends on how high you want to go when you're propelled upwards.
 


ForumFire said:
I was just wondering, if there were "super jump shoes", that would hit on the ground and would propell you upwards, how powerful would those shoes have to be?

I was hoping that you could use poweful magnets to do it. If you put like ends of two magnets together, lock them in place, and when you would be ready to jump unlock them so they would repel, how powerful would the magnets have to be?

Something like this?


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/17/b...9e4641&ex=1331784000&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top