How Should Negative Improvement Be Recorded in Pre-Post Test Data Analysis?

  • Thread starter Thread starter craig100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Test
craig100
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hello There,

I'm after a little advice; I have data collected during experimentation that was designed to determine the improvement of two groups of subjects between a pre and a post-test. The results are as follows:
Pre & Post test numbers represent the number of errors made
Group 1:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	0	0
1	0	1
5	4	1
12	0	12
2	0	2
7	6	1
0	0	0
13	0	13

Group 2:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	1	-1
2	0	2
1	0	1
0	0	0
0	11	-11
5	23	-18

I'm applying the t-test to determine if there is a statistical difference between the means(of the improvement columns).

My question is really simple(hopefully)... in group 2, should I be recording improvement as a negative number? or simply zero?

Using zero will not give me a significant statistical difference between the means of group 1 and group 2... using the negative numbers does.

Also, if I'm keeping the negative improvement numbers, is it okay to represent improvement as a negative percentage?

I've not done much with statistics, so would appreciate your input.

Thanks,
Craig.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
craig100 said:
Hello There,

I'm after a little advice; I have data collected during experimentation that was designed to determine the improvement of two groups of subjects between a pre and a post-test. The results are as follows:
Pre & Post test numbers represent the number of errors made
Group 1:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	0	0
1	0	1
5	4	1
12	0	12
2	0	2
7	6	1
0	0	0
13	0	13

Group 2:
Code:
Pre|Post|Improvement
0	1	-1
2	0	2
1	0	1
0	0	0
0	11	-11
5	23	-18

I'm applying the t-test to determine if there is a statistical difference between the means(of the improvement columns).

My question is really simple(hopefully)... in group 2, should I be recording improvement as a negative number? or simply zero?

Using zero will not give me a significant statistical difference between the means of group 1 and group 2... using the negative numbers does.

Also, if I'm keeping the negative improvement numbers, is it okay to represent improvement as a negative percentage?

I've not done much with statistics, so would appreciate your input.

Thanks,
Craig.

Since you are subtracting in the order Pre-Post, a negative difference indicates a higher value in the post data - that's what you are hoping to find, if I understand you correctly.

Note that you are free to subtract in either order: if the negative differences are giving you a conceptual problem, subtract in the other order.

I would be more concerned about doing t-tests with such small samples.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top