How should -x^2 be treated in graphing equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Rev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
AI Thread Summary
When graphing equations, -x^2 should be treated as -1 times x^2, meaning the negative sign is a factor and does not affect the squaring of x itself. This results in the graph of y=-x^2 being an inverted version of y=x^2. The distinction is crucial because (-x)^2 equals x^2, while -x^2 does not. Therefore, the negative sign alters the output of the function but does not change the input variable x during squaring. Understanding this difference is essential for accurate graphing and interpretation of quadratic functions.
The Rev
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
I'm graphing equations, and I ran into a snag. I assumed that the graph would be the same for both of the following:

y=x^2 and y=-x^2

since any negative number squared is equal to it's absolute value squared.

However, the book showed equation 2 as having an inverted graph of equation 1.

So, I suppose my question is, when I come across -x^2 should I treat it like -(x^2) or like (-x)^2? IOW, should -x be treated as -1*x or as a number in and of itself, like -2?

Thanks.

\phi

The Rev
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x^2 = (-x)^2 by some algebra. However you can show that -x^2 \neq x^2 by some more algebra!

-x^2 = -1 x^2
 
the negative sign in -X is just a factor. so when you have -x^2 you are only squaring the X and not the factor that goes along with it. just like if you had 2x^2 you don't square the two. if you want to square the two, you'd use parenthesis, (2x)^2 same if you want to square the negative.

as far as how to generally treat -X you do just like i mentioned. you treat the negative as a factor, cause that's all it is. the negative symbol has different meanings, so its best to treat it separately. if you have a negative exponent for example, that's telling you that you've got to flip the fraction. if you have a negative with vectors, that has to do with direction.

another thing to remember is that -X isn't necessarily a negative number. if you plug -2 into that, you get a postive number. so, you aren't just putting a negative sign in front of everything, that negative symbol means you' get the opposite of whatever you put in.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the clarification!

\phi

The Rev
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
987
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top