How supposed I imagine the following equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomcenjerrym
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the concept of an open subset in R^n and its relationship to functions. It clarifies that a function u maps elements from an open subset U to real numbers, indicating that U is a subset of another set P. The key point is that for every element x in U, it must also belong to P. The participants seek to understand the implications of being an element of an open set in R^n. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the nature of functions and subsets in mathematical contexts.
tomcenjerrym
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
What is SUBSET on “open subset of R^{n}"?
How supposed I imagine the following equations?

u : UR
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
it's the same as any other subset.

U is a subset of P if

for all x in U x is also in P.

So what does it mean to be an element of an open set of R^n?

u is probably a function.

It assigns each element in U to one element in R
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top