How the acceleration of gravity is almost equal to pi squared?

  • Thread starter Thread starter LuGoBi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pi
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation that the acceleration due to gravity is nearly equal to pi squared, prompting a debate about the significance of this relationship. Participants note that gravity's value changes with elevation and highlight the arbitrary nature of unit selection in mathematical comparisons. The conversation touches on other numerical coincidences, such as the number of seconds in a year and the speed of light in specific units, ultimately concluding that these correlations are examples of numerology rather than meaningful scientific relationships. The consensus is that such numerical coincidences lack substantive value in scientific discourse.
LuGoBi
Have you guys noticed how the acceleration of gravity is almost equal to pi squared?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yea but you have to remember that the acceleration due to gravity changes with elevation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_gravity

If you found two universal constants that were related like e and i then you have something big.
 
And of course it only works in metric units.
Similairly there afre about 10milion pi seconds in a year.
A second is a milli-fortnight and an inch is an attoparsec.
 
Hm? g is 175.55 furlongs/minute^2. How is that almost equal to pi^2? Or does it only work in some arbitrarily selected set of units?
 
nicksauce said:
Hm? g is 175.55 furlongs/minute^2. How is that almost equal to pi^2? Or does it only work in some arbitrarily selected set of units?

mgb_phys has answered that.

Anyway, is there any point to this thread other than "spot the coincidence"?
 
If you select units correctly, everything is possible. Light speed is almost exactly 1 feet/ns.
 
cristo said:
mgb_phys has answered that.

Yes, I know. I just thought a hard example like that might help show the OP how absurd this sort of numerology is.
 
nicksauce said:
Yes, I know. I just thought a hard example like that might help show the OP how absurd this sort of numerology is.

Fair enough. Well, I think we've established that this is, as you say, simply numerology. Thus, this thread is done.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
702
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
Back
Top