How Thick is the Oil Layer for Strong Reflection of Green Light?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the thickness of the oil layer that reflects green light, the correct approach involves using the refractive indices of air and oil rather than oil and water. The initial calculation incorrectly used the oil and water indices, leading to a wavelength of 592 nm instead of the correct wavelength of 444 nm after adjusting for the air's refractive index. The thickness formula for strong reflection is t = mλ/2, where m is the order of interference maxima. Applying the corrected wavelength, the thickness of the oil layer should be 222 nm, aligning with the book's answer. Understanding the principles of thin film interference is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
Terraist
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm a high school physics student and I'm having a lot of trouble with thin film interference

Homework Statement



A thin layer of oil (noil=1.25) is floating on water (n=1.33). How thick is the oil in the region that strongly reflects green light (λ=556nm)?

Homework Equations



noil/nwater = λwater/λoil

t = mλ/2, where t is thickness of the film, m is order of interference maxima (i'm not sure about this one)

The Attempt at a Solution



1.25/1.33 = 556/λ
λ=592 nm

t=mλ/2
=(1)(592)/2
=296 nm

(ans in book 222 nm)

I'm not entirely sure of what I'm doing here. I'm trying to just find the right formula to plug the variables in and I don't grasp the principles behind it. If someone could shed some light on the subject and provide some tips on how to solve similar problems it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everything is right except you're not supposed to use n oil and water but rather n air and oil, because the ray is coming from above in air and not from the water right?( I think this is a trick question or something) So your new wavelength would be 556/1.33 (n air is 1) = 444 and you should get the books answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top