How Thick Should the Aluminum Sheet Be for the Box to Float as Described?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Menisto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
AI Thread Summary
To determine the thickness of an aluminum sheet for a closed cubical box to float with 25% of its volume above water, the effective density of the box must be 750 kg/m^3. The mass of the aluminum sheet is calculated as 16200 x(s^2), where s is the side length and x is the thickness. However, the discussion reveals a lack of sufficient information to accurately solve the problem, as surface area does not directly correlate with volume. Even precise calculations of aluminum volume versus air volume do not yield a definitive solution. The frustration stems from the complexity of the problem and inconsistencies in the professor's course materials.
Menisto
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
A closed cubical box made of aluminum sheet floats in water with (1/4) of the volume above water. Determine the thickness of the sheet.

I first found out what the density would need to be for this orientation:

75% below water or

X % = density of box/ density of water

.75 = p/(1000)

p = 750 kg/m^3 --> effective density.

p = M(sheet) / Volume(box)

Mass of the sheet is then = 6p(s^2)x

where s is the length of a side of the cube, x is the thickness of the sheet and p is the density of aluminum (2700 kg/m^3)

M = 16200 x(s^2)

Therefore: 750 = 16200 x(s^2) / s^3

.0463 = x/s

The problem is, there seems to be not enough information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Am I correct in assuming this?
 
Menisto said:
The problem is, there seems to be not enough information.
You are correct. Surface area is not proportional to volume. Even if you did a more precise calculation of the volume of aluminum as the difference between outer volume and inner volume, you can still go from essentially a solid cube of aluminum to a huge cube with a very small ratio of aluminum volume to air volume (low density) using the same thickness of walls. There has to be more information to solve the problem.
 
Ok, thank you. I thought I was going crazy there for a second, too many hours of homework. It doens't help when the professor makes his own course packet, and has to correct problems and answers for every homework set. It gets a little frustrating.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top