How to actually think through something

  • Thread starter Thread starter cs23
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Struggling with problem-solving is a common experience, especially in subjects like physics, math, and computer science. Many individuals find themselves relying heavily on solved examples, which can hinder their ability to tackle more complex problems independently. It's important to understand that getting stuck is a natural part of the learning process, and resisting the urge to look at solutions can foster deeper understanding. To improve problem-solving skills, it's essential to grasp the underlying concepts and organize all relevant information before attempting to solve a problem. Developing a clear plan to connect known information to the desired outcome can simplify the problem-solving process. Resources such as textbooks on problem-solving techniques, like Polya's "How To Solve It," and access to professors, teaching assistants, and online forums can provide valuable support. Utilizing these resources effectively can enhance learning and build confidence in tackling challenging problems.
cs23
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
I am quite pathetic when trying to solve problems. When solving problems i always refer back to solved examples. It's like comparing my self to someone who can trace a picture very well but can't draw the picture. The examples only help so far, once a much harder problem comes I'm finished. I have no idea how to begin. I've noticed this in physics, math, and comp sci. But, i do well in these classes, but my inability to think is very stressful.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just try to wean yourself off of them.

Getting stuck is an essential part of your education, so don't worry about getting stuck and resist the urge to look at solutions.

It also helps to really try to understand the concepts.
 
homeomorphic said:
Just try to wean yourself off of them.

Getting stuck is an essential part of your education, so don't worry about getting stuck and resist the urge to look at solutions.

It also helps to really try to understand the concepts.

Thanks for the note. I have always heard "try to understand the concepts", but i don't think i get it. Is there a certain amount of knowledge i should have before i start on the problems? I read the theory(superficially that is) to get a general idea.
 
At first degree level, it's mostly a matter of organizing all the information you have (note the word "all") about the subject in general and your problem in particular, and figuring out a plan to get from "what you know already" to "what you want". Once you have a plan, the rest is "just algebra" to work through the details. If the plan has more than 2 or 3 steps in it, there is probably a shorter one (but any plan that works is better than no plan at all). Making that sort of plan helps to make your written answers more logical, and therefore a marker can see that you were doing the right things, even when the details went wrong and you got the "wrong answer".

You could try reading some books on problem solving techniques, like Polya's "How To Solve It" (his examples are mostly based on fairly simple math) or there are some more modern ones that Micromass has mentioned them a few times on this forum.
 
Hey cs23.

One piece of advice would be to make use of your resources.

Nowadays you have staff you can go to (professors,lecturers,TA's,etc) as well as the internet (forums like PF, online notes, blogs, etc) and also your peers (in class, out of class).

Thankfully it has become a lot easier nowadays as a result of breaking the communication bottleneck and resource availability through things like organized learning centres (university, college) and the internet.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
672
Replies
32
Views
405
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Back
Top