How to actually understand a topic

  • Thread starter Thread starter R.P.F.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topic
AI Thread Summary
A math and physics double major expresses difficulty in achieving a deep understanding of physics topics, particularly quantum mechanics, despite excelling in problem-solving and exams. This leads to feelings of impostor syndrome, as the individual struggles to connect concepts and teach the material. Responses highlight that many find physics, especially quantum mechanics, non-intuitive and complex, emphasizing that true understanding develops over time through continued study and engagement with the material. Suggestions include working on derivations of key theories, which can enhance comprehension and insight into underlying principles. The discussion reassures that it is common to feel overwhelmed and that mastery in these fields requires years of effort and learning. Overall, the importance of persistence, self-reflection, and collaboration in the learning process is underscored.
R.P.F.
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a math and physics double major. But somehow I feel that it is very difficult for me to get a deep understanding of some topics in physics. I get all the mathematical muscles needed to solve problems and I score the highest on the exams. But I feel that I am actually faking it. I get this feeling all the time when I was taking quantum. I do not see the underlying physics behind the problem. Is that a way to understand a topic thoroughly and build up physical intuitions? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it not be that some things in physics, especially quantum mechanics, are just incredibly difficult to picture in your head and completely non-intuitive. A lot of physics cannot easily be built from intuition for this reason, and mathematical logic is the only way to proceed.
 
micromass said:
Hi R.P.F.! :smile:

Are you sure it's not just http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impostor_syndrome because judging from your post, it looks like that...

Hi! But..I feel that one only has a good understanding of a topic when he can teach it. I am definitely not good enough to teach, say, quantum. If you throw me a problem then I can do it. But I cannot connect ideas between problems. I guess I'll have to work on more problems. ╭(╯^╰)╮
 
JesseC said:
Could it not be that some things in physics, especially quantum mechanics, are just incredibly difficult to picture in your head and completely non-intuitive. A lot of physics cannot easily be built from intuition for this reason, and mathematical logic is the only way to proceed.

That is also true. But I want to understand quantum so badly...
 
Well, you're not supposed to be able to teach it during your first course. You take it once, get some familiarity with the equations and concepts. Then you take more courses which draw on that material, use the material in your own research, see those equations come up in practice in research papers, etc. Your understanding should keep growing over time and eventually you may be able to teach it. Talking to others about it helps a ton too (this forum is good for that).

Also I'm sure a lot of professors who seem to know everything were not so proficient in their first semester of teaching the course.

IMO, science is very complicated and many aspects of it are subtle. It's better to constantly doubt yourself and question your understanding than to be one of these people who just doesn't seem to realize that they are oversimplifying things. Just always try to break a problem down to the elements that you're really sure about, even if that doesn't seem like much.
 
R.P.F. said:
Hello,

I am a math and physics double major. But somehow I feel that it is very difficult for me to get a deep understanding of some topics in physics. I get all the mathematical muscles needed to solve problems and I score the highest on the exams. But I feel that I am actually faking it. I get this feeling all the time when I was taking quantum. I do not see the underlying physics behind the problem. Is that a way to understand a topic thoroughly and build up physical intuitions? Thank you very much.

I think if you can get that kind of understanding in one course, you're either very intelligent, or you have a great teacher or both.

If you can do that, then great. But its just not possible to know all the nooks and crannies and put so many things into context like a professor (or some expert) can. Also don't feel bad about that, because it takes people years and years of their life to get to that stage.

Also since you are saying you are doing a math double major, I think its being a bit hard on yourself to have deep knowledge about math or physics let alone both of them. One thing you should remind yourself is that the stuff you are learning has been done by many dozens (if not hundreds or thousands) of people, all who are very smart, and all who have spent a lot of time to contribute in some small way to the body of knowledge that we take for granted. When you put that into perspective, I think it doesn't make sense to be hard on yourself.

Keep at it, and things will come.
 
R.P.F. said:
Hello,

I am a math and physics double major. But somehow I feel that it is very difficult for me to get a deep understanding of some topics in physics. I get all the mathematical muscles needed to solve problems and I score the highest on the exams. But I feel that I am actually faking it. I get this feeling all the time when I was taking quantum. I do not see the underlying physics behind the problem. Is that a way to understand a topic thoroughly and build up physical intuitions? Thank you very much.

Did you try working on derivations of your favourite theories, for example: a derivation of the Schrodinger equation? This can help you gain more insight/understanding into the assumptions that go into an equation. Personally this is the only way for me to study physics on a deep level, and I enjoy it a lot!
 
You can derive the Schrodinger equation?
 
  • #10
For example: I have on my desk now the paper "Feynman's derivation of the Schrodinger equation" by David Derbes (Am. J. Phys. 64 (7), 1996). It says that "many of the standard techniques of quantum field theory derive from [it]".
 
  • #11
johng23 said:
You can derive the Schrodinger equation?
Yeah you can if you start from some other point of QM. One way is to start out with which commutator relations you want to hold and from that derive the equation.
 
  • #12
johng23 said:
Well, you're not supposed to be able to teach it during your first course. You take it once, get some familiarity with the equations and concepts. Then you take more courses which draw on that material, use the material in your own research, see those equations come up in practice in research papers, etc. Your understanding should keep growing over time and eventually you may be able to teach it. Talking to others about it helps a ton too (this forum is good for that).

Also I'm sure a lot of professors who seem to know everything were not so proficient in their first semester of teaching the course.

IMO, science is very complicated and many aspects of it are subtle. It's better to constantly doubt yourself and question your understanding than to be one of these people who just doesn't seem to realize that they are oversimplifying things. Just always try to break a problem down to the elements that you're really sure about, even if that doesn't seem like much.

Thank you! I just get started on my research which requires a deeper understanding of quantum than i currently have, so I'm working on it.
And yes the easiest way to derive the SE is to use the relation between the time-evolution operator and the Hamiltonian. I only know how to do it for a pure state though.
 
  • #13
Sybren said:
Did you try working on derivations of your favourite theories, for example: a derivation of the Schrodinger equation? This can help you gain more insight/understanding into the assumptions that go into an equation. Personally this is the only way for me to study physics on a deep level, and I enjoy it a lot!

I have been thinking about that but I lacked motivation. I guess this is the time to get started! :)
 
  • #14
chiro said:
I think if you can get that kind of understanding in one course, you're either very intelligent, or you have a great teacher or both.

If you can do that, then great. But its just not possible to know all the nooks and crannies and put so many things into context like a professor (or some expert) can. Also don't feel bad about that, because it takes people years and years of their life to get to that stage.

Also since you are saying you are doing a math double major, I think its being a bit hard on yourself to have deep knowledge about math or physics let alone both of them. One thing you should remind yourself is that the stuff you are learning has been done by many dozens (if not hundreds or thousands) of people, all who are very smart, and all who have spent a lot of time to contribute in some small way to the body of knowledge that we take for granted. When you put that into perspective, I think it doesn't make sense to be hard on yourself.

Keep at it, and things will come.

Thank you! After going deeper and deeper into math and physics, I am surprised by how different the ways of thinking in each subject are!
 
Back
Top