How to Analyze Palladium Content in a Meteorite Using Standard Addition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thea831
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Addition Standard
AI Thread Summary
Palladium content in a meteorite is analyzed using a standard addition method involving the formation of a colored complex with arsenazo III at pH 3.5. The meteorite sample is digested, and the resulting solution is purified via ion chromatography before dilution. Absorbance measurements at 660 nm are taken for various volumes of a standard palladium solution added to the sample. The discussion highlights confusion regarding the graphing of absorbance versus intensity, with emphasis on the need to plot concentration against absorbance rather than intensity. Ultimately, the goal is to calculate the concentration of palladium in the original meteorite sample.
thea831
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Palladium(II) forms an intensely colored complex at pH3.5 with arsenazo III at 660 nm. A analyst is trying to analyze the palladium content in a meteorite. First 2.534g of the meteorite was digested in strong mineral acids. The resulting solution was then evaporated into dryness, dissolved in hydrochloric acid, and separated from interference by ion chromatography. The resulting solution containing an unknown amount of Pd(II) was then diluted to 50.00ML with pH 3.5 buffer. Ten‐milliliter aliquots of this analyte solution were then transferred to 5 volumetric flasks. A standard solution was then prepared that was 1.00 ×10‐5 M in Pd(II). Volumes of the standard solution shown in the table were then pipetted into the flasks along with 10.00 mL of 0.01 M arsenazo III. Each solution was then diluted to 50.00 mL, and the absorbance of each solution was measured at 660 nm in 1.00
cm cells.
Volume standard addition Absorbance
0 0.216
5 .338
10 0.471
15 0.596
20 0.764

(a) Plot the standard‐additions plot using a spreadsheet, determine the slope and the
intercept of the line.
(b)Calculate the concentr
ation of Pd (II) in the solution.
(c)
Express the concentration of Palladium in the original meteorite in an appropriate unit.

Homework Equations



standard addition graph
intensity
background intensity

deltI/deltC

The Attempt at a Solution



I can't graph this without the intensities. I don't know how to find the intensity. I can use the absorbance to calculate the transimittance but its a ratio of the intensities.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't graph concentration against intensity, but against absorbance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
really? Our professor really didn't tell us anything about this. We had to search for it online and apparently its a graph of concentration vs. Corrected intensity. But I will try graphing it vs absorbance
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top