How to Balance PhCHO + SF4 Reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter orgmann
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction
AI Thread Summary
The reaction between PhCHO (benzaldehyde) and SF4 involves understanding the electron interactions and stability of the compounds. Benzaldehyde has two lone pairs on oxygen, two electrons in a pi bond, and resonance electrons in the benzene ring, which limits its reactivity. The positive charge on the carbonyl carbon is stabilized by the surrounding benzene ring and oxygen. The sulfur in SF4 will acquire a negative charge due to the addition of electrons, while the carbonyl carbon retains a positive charge. Consideration of these charges and the stability of sulfur is crucial for determining the reaction mechanism.
orgmann
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Please post this type of questions in HW section using the template.
There is reaction between
PhCHO + SF4
I tried to make the mechanism but I stuck .
1464172964490.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not quite sure what PhCHO is, it seems as though it is benzaldehyde. If that's the case let's look at your electrons that can participate in bonding. You have two lone pairs on an oxygen, two electrons in a pi bond, and 6 pi electrons in resonance in your ring. These are the only electrons that will be able to form a bond and given the reactivity of benzene pi bonds, it's unlikely that they will be involved. Also think about you the stability. The positive carbon is fairly stable due to the benzene ring on one side and oxygen on the other.
 
Your last compound is wrong. The sulphur shall have a -ve charge due to accumulation of another pair of electrons and the carbonyl carbon shall have +ve charge. That should help you get the mechanism. Post that, think about the stability of the sulphur and how it can become more stable.
 

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

Chemistry How to determine whether a single reaction is better than multi-stage reaction?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Chemistry Question about balancing a reaction
Replies
5
Views
2K
Chemistry How do we interpret the steps in the algorithm to balance a redox equation?
Replies
7
Views
2K
Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem
Replies
12
Views
3K
Chemistry Reactions With Dilute Hydrochloric Acid
Replies
3
Views
2K
Chemistry Will this reaction cause an increase or decrease in temperature?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Chemistry Why is My Second-Order Reaction Rate Calculation Incorrect?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Chemistry Draw the mechanism of the reactions of steps 1 and 2
Replies
4
Views
2K
Chemistry What is the purpose of redox reactions?
Replies
18
Views
5K
Is E1 or E2 the Correct Mechanism for Bulky Base Eliminations?
Replies
3
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top