How to calculate confidence interval not on t-table

Notoriousb3
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
So as the title says. How do you calculate the confidence interval that is not on the t-table. For example how do you calculate the confidence interval for 97%? Assume that it is a normal distribution, you are not given σ and that n<30. Is there a formula? Or should i look for a more specific t-table?:P
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Notoriousb3 said:
So as the title says. How do you calculate the confidence interval that is not on the t-table. For example how do you calculate the confidence interval for 97%? Assume that it is a normal distribution, you are not given σ and that n<30. Is there a formula? Or should i look for a more specific t-table?:P

You need a calculator that can calculate the inverse of the cumulative t-distribution.

In Mathematica this would be: inversecdf[ studenttdistribution[n-1], 0.015 ] for the lower bound, which is negative.
In this formula n-1 is the so called "degrees of freedom", usually designated "df".
And 0.015 is half of the remaining chance, which is (1 - 0.97) / 2.
Since the t-distribution is symmetric, the upper bound equals minus the lower bound.

You can evaluate this for yourself on the web:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=inversecdf[+studenttdistribution[29

Does this answer your question?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry but I don't understand your response what is "inversecdf" and "studenttdistribution". Also what kind of calculator would I need to calculate the inverse of the cumulative t-distribution? I'm rolling on a ti-83 plus and this baby has yet to fail me. Just to be clear, I know how to calculate a confidence interval for the following 80%, 90%, 95%, 98% and 99%. But I would like to know how you would calculate the confidence interval that cannot be solved with the student t distribution. i.e 93%, 97% etc.
 
Notoriousb3 said:
Sorry but I don't understand your response what is "inversecdf" and "studenttdistribution". Also what kind of calculator would I need to calculate the inverse of the cumulative t-distribution? I'm rolling on a ti-83 plus and this baby has yet to fail me. Just to be clear, I know how to calculate a confidence interval for the following 80%, 90%, 95%, 98% and 99%. But I would like to know how you would calculate the confidence interval that cannot be solved with the student t distribution. i.e 93%, 97% etc.

The offical name of the t-table is the student-t-distribution-table.
"inversecdf" stands for the inverse of the cumulative distribution function.

To calculate this on a graphical calculator you can use the invT-function.
However it seems this function is not available on the ti-83+, but is available on the ti-84.
But there are ways described on the internet how to do this anyway with the ti-83+.

I found a youtube video describing exactly you problem and how to solve it on your calculator:



And I found another procedure to calculate invT on:

http://www.angelfire.com/pro/fkizer/Instructions/tiusrmanstat83.htm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top