How to calculate divergence of some special fields

  • Thread starter Thread starter netheril96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Fields
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the divergence of the radial unit vector divided by the square of the radius, specifically how it relates to the Dirac delta function. It is established that while the divergence is zero for r not equal to zero, integrating over a volume leads to a result of 4π, aligning with Gauss' Theorem. The challenge arises when attempting to directly apply the divergence formula in spherical coordinates, as it does not yield the expected result of 4π without considering the singularity at r=0. A connection to the Dirac delta function is sought, emphasizing the need for a limiting procedure to handle the singularity. The conversation highlights the complexities of treating delta functions in spherical coordinates and the necessity of understanding their definitions.
netheril96
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
\[<br /> \nabla \cdot \frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }} = 4\pi \delta (\vec r)<br /> \]<br />
This can be seen from\[<br /> \nabla \cdot \frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }} = \frac{1}{{r^2 }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(r^2 \cdot \frac{1}{{r^2 }}) = \frac{1}{{r^2 }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(1) = 0(r \ne 0)<br /> \]<br />
And from Gauss' Theorem\[<br /> \int_V {(\nabla \cdot \frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }})dV = \oint_S {\frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }} \cdot d\vec S} } = 4\pi <br /> \]<br />
But if I want to directly using the formula of divergence in spherical coordinates,I can only get\[<br /> \nabla \cdot \frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }} = \frac{1}{{r^2 }}\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(\frac{{r^2 }}{{r^2 }})<br /> \]<br />
And integrating this over a volume cannot give me the result of 4π\[<br /> \int_V {(\nabla \cdot \frac{{\vec e_r }}{{r^2 }})dV = } \int_0^\pi {\sin \theta d\theta \int_0^{2\pi } {d\phi \int_0^R {\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(\frac{{r^2 }}{{r^2 }})} } } dr = 4\pi \int_0^R {\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(\frac{{r^2 }}{{r^2 }})} dr<br /> \]<br />
(Here V is a sphere with radius of R)
So how can I connect it with Dirac Delta?
By the way,I post this here because this problem arises in the electrostatic field of a point charge and I found nothing about such thing in any book concerning δ(x).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is that \frac{r^2}{r^2}=\infty at r=0.
 
gabbagabbahey said:
The problem is that \frac{r^2}{r^2}=\infty at r=0.

So how can I get\[<br /> \int_0^R {\frac{\partial }{{\partial r}}(\frac{{r^2 }}{{r^2 }})} dr = 1<br /> \]<br />
Without integration,you cannot conclude some function with a singularity is δ(x)
 
Other than just using Gauss' Law, I suppose an appropriate limiting procedure can be used. I'd start with your expression for \mathbf{\nabla}\cdot\left(\frac{\textbf{e}_r}{r^2}\right) and calculate the limit of it as r\to 0
 
As you have seen \delta({\vec r}) is not easily treated in spherical coordinates.
What is wrong with your first two lines? They constitute one of the definitions of the delta function, which is as 'direct' as you can get.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top