How to calculate Helium lensing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jon Richfield
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helium Lensing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the characteristics of a hypothetical spherical helium mass with a temperature range of 200K to 300K, exploring its gravitational lensing properties. Key questions include whether the helium cloud could maintain a homogeneous temperature and the implications of its temperature profiles on entropy. The conversation also considers the visibility through the cloud and the effects of rotation on its shape and density profile, particularly in relation to gravitational lensing. The mention of helium is due to its potential advantages over other gases like nitrogen or argon in this theoretical scenario. Overall, the thread seeks insights into the physical properties and behaviors of such a helium mass in the context of gravitational lensing.
Jon Richfield
Messages
482
Reaction score
48
Forgive what might strike you as an excessively elementary question, as well as irrelevant, but...
Well, at least I guarantee that it is not any classroom project!

Imagine a mass of pretty clean helium (yeah, *I* know, but this is an academic exercise! :smile: It gets worse; read on!) Imagine that its near "surface" temperature is somewhere near 200k to 300K and that everything in the neighbourhood is pretty stable and benign, apart from being cool. The mass is spherical and not rotating significantly. It also is sufficient to retain most of the He gravitationally for a few hundred million years or so. (A couple of Earth masses or so?)

Now, how do I calculate the characteristics of such a hypothetical spherical cloud? Could it have a homogeneous temperature, and if not, what would the entropic implications of its temperature profiles be? How far could one see through it? (Well, before dust started messing it up anyway!)

Why helium? Well, I suppose N2 or Ar would do as well, maybe better, but He seemed to avoid some possible practical problems under conditions at which ideal gas laws might get a bit distorted.

Then, if anyone did kindly explicate, would s/he like to imagine what would happen if the mass were indeed to be rotated at a speed sufficient to rotate non-turbulently, fast enough to flatten the spheroid very markedly, say to an aspect ratio of 1 to 2 or so? Would the density profile have any useful characteristics for lensing?

If no one has the patience for this, I would not feel insulted. I am familiar with the observation that a fool can ask more questions than ten wise men would bother to try answering.

But thanks if anyone feels like trying!

Jon
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Helium lensing is a gravitational lensing effect caused by the presence of a large mass such as a galaxy or cluster of galaxies. The Earth is located in a relatively low‐density region, so that the intervening matter produces a small lensing effect. The lensing caused by the Earth produces a very faint ring around the sun called the Airy disk, named after George Biddell Airy, the 19th century British astronomer who first predicted this effect.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top