How to Calculate the Limit of Fraction Involving Four Vectors with q --> 0

parton
Messages
79
Reaction score
1
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

Hi parton! :smile:

If we're letting q --> 0, then we may as well put q = (a,0,0,0) and let a --> 0.

Then it's -ap0p2/(-ap0 ± √(a2p02 - a2p2)), = -p0p2/(-p0 ± √(p02 - p2)),

which I think is m2/(1 ± v).

But I expect the result is different if q --> 0 along some other path.
 
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

I would like to see a general solution to this as well. I poked at it but nothing immediately jumped out at me. The general solution must determine how -pq compares to \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} as q-->0. It's not obvious to me that the latter approaches zero any order "faster" so the ratio \dfrac{- (pq) }{ \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}} must approach some constant, but does that constant depend on q's path?

I'm guessing there is either some nice identity that you can use if you expand it all out OR you may have to use some differentials to eventually end up with A p^{2} where A is some constant.

Although, if the answer really is path independent, then choosing your favorite path might be the way to go like tiny-tim suggested!
 
parton said:
I should calculate the limit of the following fraction

\dfrac{- (pq) p^{2}}{-pq \pm \sqrt{(pq)^{2} - p^{2} q^{2}}}.

with q --> 0, but I don't know how to do that.

p and q are two four-vectors, so we have: pq = p_{\mu} q^{\mu} and so on.

Does anyone have an idea? Or at least: Is it somehow possible to "simplify" or rewrite the expression in the limit q --> 0 ?

I think you can do this without loss of generality by choosing a coordinate system where q = (a,0,0,0), like tiny-tim suggested. Then (pq)^2 = (p_0a)^2, and p^2 q^2 = p^2 a^2, so then you have

\frac{ -p_0 a p^2}{-p_0a \pm \sqrt{a^2(p_0^2 - p^2)}}

The a's can now be canceled out to give

\frac{ -p_0 p^2}{-p_0 \pm \sqrt{p_0^2 - p^2}}

In another coordinate system, you would interpret p_0 as the component of p that points in the direction of q. I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have p^2 \ge p_0^2, so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.
 
kanato said:
...I'm a bit surprised at the sign under the square root, since you should have p^2 \ge p_0^2, so maybe I've screwed something up; it's been a whiel since I worked with 4-vectors.

Everything is OK: p2=m2 but p02>m2.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top