How to Calculate the Proportionality Constant for a Two Tank System

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the proportionality constant for a two-tank water system, where water flows into one tank and out of another. The equations presented indicate that the flow rates are influenced by the water levels and orifice constants, which are typically determined experimentally. It is noted that the system is nonlinear, requiring linearization around an equilibrium point to accurately model the flow dynamics. The suggestion is to define perturbations based on the steady-state equilibrium values of the water levels to create a linear representation of the system. This approach will yield a more reliable model for understanding the flow behavior in the two-tank system.
Merk
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Greetings! We are designing a very basic two tank system with water flowing in one tank, and out the other. As illustrated here:

YvRz0.jpg


We have come up with two equations, which should be pretty self-explanatory. W is waterflow, A is area, h is the water level and so forth.

aviM4.png


As you can see, we assume the waterflow out is proportional with the water level. The problem is, we have no idea how to calculate this value k. Any suggestions?

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I did something very similar recently for an experiment in control engineering.

The system is actually nonlinear, and gives rise to equations like:

A_1 \dot{h_1} = Q_{in} - Q_1
A_2 \dot{h_2} = Q_1 - Q_{out}

where:

Q_1 = \sigma_1 A_1 \sqrt{2g(h_1 - h_a)}
Q_{out} = \sigma_2 A_2 \sqrt{2g(h_2 - h_b)}

the Q's are the flowrates, g is the gravitational constant, A the areas and h_a and h_b the height of the orifices at the exits of the first and second tank, respectively. Sigma 1 and 2 are termed the 'orifice constants' and are generally known, or found experimentally.

Since water cannot flow back from tank 2 to tank 1 etc. it must also be the case that:

Q_{in} \geq 0
Q_1 \geq 0
Q_{out} \geq 0

Which are also nonlinearities. The equations need to be linearized about an equilibrium point (for some value of Q_in) - simply assuming that the flow out of each tank is proportional to the height of water in the tank, like you have, will give a very poor model of the system.

Instead you need to define something like:

z_1 = h_1 - h^0_1
z_2 = h_2 - h^0_2

where the second terms are the (steady-state) equilibrium values of h for a given Q_in.

You should then find a system that is linear in the purtubations z_1 and z_2.

Hope this helps.
 
Last edited:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top