How to Calculate Velocity and Acceleration in Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Desii
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Harmonic
AI Thread Summary
A 300g mass on a spring oscillates between 2cm and 16cm above a tabletop with a period of 4s. The user is confused about the velocity and acceleration of the mass when it is 9cm above the tabletop, mistakenly believing both should be zero at the equilibrium position. It is clarified that while the mass can have zero velocity if released from rest at equilibrium, it can also have velocity if started with motion. The correct calculations show a velocity of 0.11 m/s and an acceleration of 0 m/s at that position. The discussion also touches on how the velocity would change if the mass were at 14cm, emphasizing that the period remains constant regardless of the starting height.
Desii
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 300g mass at the end of a spring oscillates such that it is a 2.0cm above the top of a table at its lowest point and 16cm above at its highest point. Its period is 4s. Find the Speed & acceleration of the mass when 9 cm above the tabletop?

Homework Equations


F=Kx
A (amplitude) = X(max)
V= Aω
a = xω (square)

The Attempt at a Solution


When its 9cm above the tabletop it should be at its equilibruim position. So both of them should be zero. But the answer sheet said Velocity is .11m/s and Acceleration is 0m/s
I am really confused, Could someone help me out? Please :)

In my Work i found out that the a) Amplitude is .07m and b) K ( constant) is .74

My work :
http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/2286/photonxs.jpg

Thanks in advance :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your handwriting is also very neat.. everyone that posts here seems to have nice handwriting

Regarding your question, why should velocity be zero at the equilibrium position?
 
genericusrnme said:
Your handwriting is also very neat.. everyone that posts here seems to have nice handwriting

Regarding your question, why should velocity be zero at the equilibrium position?

Haha thanks :)
I think because it's at equilibruim state which is its original position. So It should have no velocity or maybe i got the whole concept wrong. Reason I'm asking here is because my next class is on tuesday i don't want to wait that long :)
 
If the mass has a period of 4s and s≠0 then the mass must be moving.

It would have no velocity if you started the mass off at the equilibrium position, that is true, but not if you start anywhere else or start with a velocity.

If you go and look at a spring (you're a student of the physical sciences you should have at least 50 different calibrated springs on your person at anyone time) and start it moving, you can see that it doesn't have zero veolcity at the equilibrium position, at least it doesn't before friction dampens its motion out.
 
Oh wow i got it haha, Its V=Aω ---> 1.57(.07) --> .11 m/s
Now comes the acceleration part ---> a=ω(square) times x ---> 1.57(square) times (0) = 0

Great ! Am i correct?
 
I was making this question wayy too complicated for myself, turned out its a super easy question haha
 
Another question will the velocity be same if it was at 14cm above?
 
Since the period is the same no matter what height you drop the mass from, what would this tell you about it's velocity at the equilibrium position?
 
genericusrnme said:
Since the period is the same no matter what height you drop the mass from, what would this tell you about it's velocity at the equilibrium position?

That it's starting to slow down, once it reaches -A it will have 0 velocity and then it will start gaining velocity again. correct ?
 
  • #10
Correct!
 
  • #11
Can you please show me how to solve it? I want to know how can the solve if its at 14cm above table top
 
  • #12
do you know how to solve the equations of motion?
 
Back
Top