How to: compute Watts and Calories for for a bicycle, up a hill

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating Watts and Calories for cycling uphill using a specific setup involving a BS2p basic stamp, accelerometers, and sensors. The user is attempting to derive formulas for power output while considering factors like mass, pedal speed, gear ratio, and rolling resistance. A key formula presented is Watts = ma*gr*pcl*s*sin(theta) + Rr, with a separate calculation for Calories based on energy conversion. Bill M. clarifies that while Watts measure power, Calories measure energy, and suggests using the potential energy formula m*g*h to estimate calorie burn, emphasizing the need for conversion to Calories. The conversation highlights the complexity of accurately measuring energy expenditure in cycling.
wmazz
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
At 6'5", 300 lbs. and old as dirt, I am a walking and rolling testimate to F=ma. This part of my project is difficult for me, because I have never taken a physics class. All the examples I have in books and PF, deal mostly with force moving down a hill. I am trying to compute Watts and Calories, while riding at any measured angle.

I am using a BS2p basic stamp reading an 2 axis accelerometer, 2 hall sensors and a gear tooth sensor. A math coprocessor handles the math. With my current set-up the BS2p determines what gear I am in, at any time, or if I am coasting. Every calculation is started after the front wheel completes a rotation, but I have no idea if it is accurate.

Watts = ma*gr*pcl*s*sin(theta) + Rr (so long as theta is never zero) If theta = 0, then Watts = ma*gr*pcl + Rr

Calories = watts*0.2388459


m = Mass = 145kg
a = Pedal Speed = 22pi/9 rad/sec
gr = Gear Ratio = 44 : 18 (2.44 to 1) (This is gear ratio I use the most)
pcl = Pedal Crank Length = .175m
s = Front tire circumference = 2.2m
Rr = Rolling Resistance ??

I left gravity out, because I felt it would be part of Rolling resistance. Once the initial equation is working I figured on gathering Rr by comparing computed and measured data

thanks

Bill M.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There isn't a conversion between Calories and watts. Watts is power, Calories are energy. You want to know a rough estimate of how many Calories you burn going up a hill? Just find the potential energy from the change in height: m*g*h. This will be in joules though so you will have to convert to Calories which is 4184 J/Cal. So:

145 kg * 9.806 m/s^2 * h (m) / 4184 J/Cal = 0.34 Cal/m * h (m)

This value is going to be less than your actual work done due to the losses in the system, but it could be used as a sanity check for the equations that you have been trying to work with.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top