How to convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents (METs), the formula used is Total Calories Burned = Duration (in minutes) X (MET X 3.5 X weight in kg)/200. The discussion highlights that there is no direct formula to convert XYZ accelerometer data (x: 202, y: 215, z: 5) to METs. Instead, users must reference activity tables to find the appropriate MET value for their specific activity. This approach emphasizes the need for contextual understanding of physical activities to accurately apply the METs in calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task)
  • Basic knowledge of accelerometer data interpretation
  • Familiarity with calorie calculation formulas
  • Access to activity MET value tables
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to interpret accelerometer data for physical activity analysis
  • Learn how to access and utilize MET value tables for various activities
  • Explore advanced calorie calculation methods for different exercise types
  • Investigate software tools for converting accelerometer data to METs
USEFUL FOR

Fitness enthusiasts, exercise scientists, health professionals, and anyone interested in accurately calculating energy expenditure based on accelerometer data.

romelemperado
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
how to convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)??

hi all i would like to ask if how do i convert accelerometer data to metabolic equivalents(METS)??

by the way I am using this formula:

Code:
[B]Total Calories Burned[/B] = Duration (in minutes) X (MET X 3.5 X weight in kg)/200
i got that formula from this site http://www.exercise4weightloss.com/calories-burned-during-exercise.html"

what i want to do is convert XYZ data to METS equivalent so that i can substitute it to METS variable in the formula above..
example if i have this data:

x: 202
y: 215
z: 5


what is the formula? I search on www but i didn't get what i need.. ;(

I knew that it is now accurate but it doesn't matter..
pls give me some idea. IM totally bad in math and physics... hehe thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


hi.. do u have any idea with this??
 


helo?
 


The problem is that there isn't a direct equivalent. You'll just have to look up the activity you were doing on a table, and use that value.
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
24K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
60K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K