How to Convert Acetic Acid to Propanoic Acid Without Cyanide?

  • Thread starter Thread starter deep838
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acid
AI Thread Summary
Acetic acid can be converted to propanoic acid through methods that avoid cyanide, with acetyl chloride and N-methylethanamide being initial considerations. However, challenges arise in removing nitrogen and introducing a hydroxyl group. One proposed solution involves using acetyl chloride followed by diazoketone and Wolff rearrangement, ultimately adding water. The discussion highlights the complexity of chain homologation and the need for precise structural transformations. Overall, alternative pathways for this conversion are being explored, emphasizing the intricacies of organic synthesis.
deep838
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Without using a cyanide
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What other methods of chain homologation do you know?
 
i was thinking of acetyl chloride and then N-methylethanamide... that will give me 3 carbons... but then how to get rid of nitrogen and bring OH?
 
Can you draw some structures? Seems like N-methylacetamide has the wrong carbon backbone too.
 
yeah... that's where I'm stuck... i really have no idea on how to bring the carbon inside!

how about this:
acetyl chloride then diazoketone then wolff rearrangement and then water! right?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top