How to Convert Reaction Rate from mol-1sec-1 to sec-1?

AI Thread Summary
To convert the reaction rate from mol-1sec-1 to sec-1, one must consider the concentration of the reactants involved. For the reaction A + B = C, the rate can be expressed as the change in concentration over time, dC/dt, which results in units of mol/s. The second reaction, A + A = A2, follows a similar approach, where the concentration of A must be factored in. Knowing the volume of the system can aid in determining the concentration of the reactants. Ultimately, the conversion requires calculating the concentration and applying it to the reaction rate to achieve the desired units of time only.
piplaw
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi there. I have a reaction

A + B = C
I am told the reaction rate is 0.8/mol.min and I know how many molecules of A and B I have. So my question is how do I get to the reacting rate in units of time only?

The second part of the question is the same but for a dimerisation reaction.

A + A = A2

I also know the volume if that helps, though I am not sure you need it.

I am sure this is fairly simple but I seem to have had a complete brain fart and I'm going round in circles.

Thanks in advance

Phill



Thank

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please elaborate.

By definition reaction rate is dC/dt, so it should be mol/s, not mol*s.
 
Thanks my reaction rate is given in mols-1s-1. Given the state of the system (i.e number of molecule of A and B) at a give time I am required to calculate the reaction rate in s-1
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top