How to convince someone of statistical probibilities

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pengwuino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistical
Pengwuino
Gold Member
Messages
5,112
Reaction score
20
Ok I am having a really annoying time with my father here. Now statistically, you are much more likely to get in an accident in a car then in a small airplane per mile traveled. Now my father thinks that its better to say that its more dangerous to have a small airplane since you are more likely to get in an accident based on the number of times you start your engine.

Now i say, the statistic should be based on miles, he says on startup and I'm almost positive my statistic is the correct basis since people's accidents occur while driving and not when they start-up their car. Extrapolate the idea out and someone who drives 100000 in one trip has a faaaaaaaaaaaaar larger chance of getting in an accident then someone who turns his car on once and drives across the street and back.

Now i want to really verify that my statistical basis is correct... and if it is, how can you convince someone that you are right.

This may be more reasonably put in the GD section.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
the number of planes that will crash will depend on the number of times the engine has started, by the nature of their crashes (AFAIK, a longer trip does not imply a greater risk, since the plane would have a problem due to something else, ie mechanical failure when starting).
For cars, however, it is the opposite; a longer trip brings a greater risk.

If you compare them using only the statistics from the miles travelled, then you don't take into account the fact that the planes' accidents do not depend on the number of miles travelled, but rather on the number of flights.
 
Yah but the fact it has a problem is the thing. When it has a problem, there's a possibility of a crash (thus, an accident).
 
Think takeoffs and landings! :)

People who want to convince you that flying is safe use the "passenger-mile" model. Exposure time (time in transit) and number of trips (takeoffs and landings) are also valid measures but the airlines and FAA don't want to alarm people. I don't think there is a strict "right or wrong" on this issue.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top