MHB How to Correctly Express Percentage

  • Thread starter Thread starter Linda1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To determine the percentage difference in electricity usage between Nic and Linda, the correct calculation shows that Linda uses approximately 26% more electricity than Nic. This is derived by taking the difference in their usage (16211 kWh) and dividing it by Nic's usage (62425 kWh). If the question were framed as "what percent less does Nic use than Linda," the calculation would yield that Nic uses about 21% less than Linda. The base for percentage calculations is crucial, as it determines the reference point for comparison. Understanding these calculations is essential for accurately expressing percentage differences.
Linda1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I don't know how to express this: If Nic uses 62425 kwh of electricity and Linda uses 78636, does Linda use 20.6% more? How would this difference be correctly expressed as a percentage? Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, Linda!

If we let $P$ be the percentage in question, I would write:

$$P=\frac{78636-62425}{62425}\cdot100\%=\frac{64844}{2497}\%\approx25.9688\%$$
 
The percentage difference is the difference divided by the "base"
Here the difference is 78636- 62425= 16211.

Since this problem said "what percent more", the base is the smaller number, 62425.
\frac{16211}{62425}= 0.259 or 26%. Linda uses 26% more than Nic.

If the problem had said "What percent less does Nic use than Linda", the base would be the larger number, so we would calculate \frac{16211}{78636}= 0.21 or 21%. Nic uses 21% less than Linda.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top