?How to derive the equation of motion F=ma, given this info

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion F=ma, with a focus on gravitational forces and the motion of a particle influenced by a mass M. Participants are examining the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in the context of a specific problem involving gravitational attraction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the validity of their attempted solutions and the application of gravitational formulas. There are discussions about the vector nature of force and the significance of direction in motion. Some participants are exploring the implications of the particle's initial conditions and the effects of gravitational attraction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's reasoning and questioning assumptions about directionality and the application of formulas. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of considering the signs of velocity and the implications of being "under the influence" of a gravitational force.

Contextual Notes

There are references to specific formulas and the need to understand the context of the problem, including the initial conditions of the particle and the nature of the forces acting on it. Participants are also addressing potential misunderstandings related to the representation of distance and direction in their sketches.

cloud360
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
?How to derive the equation of motion F=ma, given this info

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/1557/2009b5a.gif

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Is my attempted solution correct?
[PLAIN]http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2465/2009b5asol.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Also, i would like to know if my solution to part b is correct. I have provided question and solution below, can someone kindly tell me if my solution is correct
[PLAIN]http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/8066/2009b5bsol.gif
 
Last edited by a moderator:


cloud360 said:

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img861.imageshack.us/img861/1557/2009b5a.gif

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Is my attempted solution correct?
[PLAIN]http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/2465/2009b5asol.gif[/QUOTE]
No. At the bottom of what you wrote, you have F = GMm/r2. Then you say that F = |GMm/r2|, and somehow turn that into -GMm/r2.

First off, force F is a vector (has direction). It's not a magnitude, so you can't just stick absolute values in.

Particle P starts off at speed u, so we can assume that it is not being accelerated. When it's moving, the only force on it is the force to to the gravitation from mass M. What direction is P moving? What direction is the force of attraction to M?

What you are forgetting is that F = ma = mr''.
 
Last edited by a moderator:


Mark44 said:
No. At the bottom of what you wrote, you have F = GMm/r2. Then you say that F = |GMm/r2|, and somehow turn that into -GMm/r2.

First off, force F is a vector (has direction). It's not a magnitude, so you can't just stick absolute values in.

Particle P starts off at speed u, so we can assume that it is not being accelerated. When it's moving, the only force on it is the force to to the gravitation from mass M. What direction is P moving? What direction is the force of attraction to M?

What you are forgetting is that F = ma = mr''.

Do i have to remember the formulae F=G*(Ma)(Mb)/(Rab)^2, which i gave

because i found that fomrulae on wikipedia and don't know if that is a general true formulae .

also, someone told me a=r''=r''ȓ, where ȓ is a unit vector.

is that true, if so how can i use it, as i don't know how to get negative part
 


For the b part, it looks like you have the right idea, but you could say it a lot more cleanly. For one thing, in an indefinite integral you need to include the constant of integration. For a definite integral, you don't need the constant of integration. It looks like you are adding the constant of integration when you do a definite integral.

Going from the differential equation r'' = -MG/r2, I get
[tex]v dv/dr = -MG r^{-2}[/tex]
So
[tex]v dv = -MG r^{-2}dr[/tex]

Integration gives us
[tex]\int v dv = -\int MG r^{-2}dr[/tex]
[tex]\Rightarrow (1/2) v^{2} = + MG/r + C[/tex]
Multiply both sides by 2:
[tex]v^2 = + 2MG/r + C'[/tex]
where C' = 2C

At t = 0, v(0) = u and r(0) = a, so
u2 = 2MG/a + C'
[tex]\Rightarrow C' = u^2 - 2MG/a[/tex]

Therefore
[tex]v^2 = + 2MG/r + u^2 - 2MG/a[/tex]
as required.
 


cloud360 said:
Do i have to remember the formulae F=G*(Ma)(Mb)/(Rab)^2, which i gave
I don't think so, but I suppose it depends more on what your instructor requires you to have memorized.
cloud360 said:
because i found that fomrulae on wikipedia and don't know if that is a general true formulae .

also, someone told me a=r''=r''ȓ, where ȓ is a unit vector.

is that true, if so how can i use it, as i don't know how to get negative part
I don't think the unit vector business is useful in this problem.

Just answer these questions:
In which direction is the particle moving?
In which direction is the force of attraction?
 
Mark44 said:
I don't think so, but I suppose it depends more on what your instructor requires you to have memorized.

I don't think the unit vector business is useful in this problem.

Just answer these questions:
In which direction is the particle moving?
In which direction is the force of attraction?
It says that it's moving radially.but how should I interpret that
 


cloud360 said:
It says that it's moving radially.but how should I interpret that
Look at the sketch you show in post #2. Take a radius of mass M and extend it outward. Particle P is moving along that line.

There's something else you have in post #2 is partially incorrect, and might be causing problems for you.
cloud360 said:
Anything distance = magnitude
.
There's the concept of directed distance that you are probably missing. On the real number line, +5 and -5 are both 5 units from the origin, but +5 is to the right of the origin and -5 is to the left of the origin. In all of the problems you have posted, it's important to keep track of the sign of the velocity. If v (= r'(t)) is positive, the particle is moving in the direction of positive r (usually this is to the right). If v is negative, the particle is moving in the direction of negative r.

Relative to the sketch you drew in post #2, in which direction is the particle moving?
In which direction is the force of attraction?
 


Mark44 said:
Look at the sketch you show in post #2. Take a radius of mass M and extend it outward. Particle P is moving along that line.

There's something else you have in post #2 is partially incorrect, and might be causing problems for you.
.
There's the concept of directed distance that you are probably missing. On the real number line, +5 and -5 are both 5 units from the origin, but +5 is to the right of the origin and -5 is to the left of the origin. In all of the problems you have posted, it's important to keep track of the sign of the velocity. If v (= r'(t)) is positive, the particle is moving in the direction of positive r (usually this is to the right). If v is negative, the particle is moving in the direction of negative r.

Relative to the sketch you drew in post #2, in which direction is the particle moving?
In which direction is the force of attraction?

so how do i know if its +r or -r, or +M or -M

how do i get negative part, its says it moves "under the influence of a mass M" does that mean that the direction is negative, because when it says "under the influence" i think it just means that its affected by it? not that its "under it"

i don't even know if the sketch is accurate. does it matter which way i sketch the r?
 
Last edited:
  • #10


cloud360 said:
so how do i know if its +r or -r, or +M or -M
The masses aren't going to be negative.

As for r, you need to be concerned with the direction the particle is moving. Its radial distance r is always going to be positive, but it's velocity can change sign, and that's what you need to consider. If r' > 0, the particle is moving away from O, in the direction of positive r. If r' < 0, the particle is moving toward O, in the direction of negative r. In your first post you have this:

"Initially P is at a distance of a from O when it is projected radially away from O at a speed u..."

cloud360 said:
how do i get negative part, its says it moves "under the influence of a mass M" does that mean that the direction is negative, because when it says "under the influence" i think it just means that its affected by it? not that its "under it"
The particle is projected away from O, but once it has reached a speed of u, the only force on it is the gravitational force due to mass M.

"Under the influence of" means that the particle is affected by the gravitation of mass M.
cloud360 said:
i don't even know if the sketch is accurate. does it matter which way i sketch the r?
Your sketch is accurate enough.

At time t = 0, in which direction is the particle moving? I.e., in the direction of positive r or negative r?
In which direction is the force of attraction? I.e., in the direction of positive r or negative r?
 
  • #11


Mark44 said:
The masses aren't going to be negative.

As for r, you need to be concerned with the direction the particle is moving. Its radial distance r is always going to be positive, but it's velocity can change sign, and that's what you need to consider. If r' > 0, the particle is moving away from O, in the direction of positive r. If r' < 0, the particle is moving toward O, in the direction of negative r. In your first post you have this:

"Initially P is at a distance of a from O when it is projected radially away from O at a speed u..."

The particle is projected away from O, but once it has reached a speed of u, the only force on it is the gravitational force due to mass M.

"Under the influence of" means that the particle is affected by the gravitation of mass M.
Your sketch is accurate enough.

At time t = 0, in which direction is the particle moving? I.e., in the direction of positive r or negative r?
In which direction is the force of attraction? I.e., in the direction of positive r or negative r?


when you say force of attraction you mean gravity.

so if the particle P moves away from O in positive direction, that means gravity is working against it in opposite direction.

Does this mean it is the gravity which is going to be negative as gravity awlays poitns downwards.


In conclusion, am i right to say in every single question like this, the gravity will be -G or -i in polar co ordinates (i.e pointing downwards)

so in this question should i just add a negative part and explain why i added it?is it that simple, or do i need to do some algebra?
 
  • #12


cloud360 said:
when you say force of attraction you mean gravity.
Yes, the only force in this problem is the force due to gravity.
cloud360 said:
so if the particle P moves away from O in positive direction, that means gravity is working against it in opposite direction.
Yes, and that's what I've been trying to get you to realize.
cloud360 said:
Does this mean it is the gravity which is going to be negative as gravity awlays poitns downwards.
No, I'm talking about the force that is due to gravity. Mass M exerts a force on particle P, but P also exerts a force on M. The force that particle P "feels" is in the direction of O, which is in the direction of negative r. P's velocity is initially in the direction of positive r.

Going back to your first post in this thread, what is force that P feels due to gravitational attraction? Which direction is that force pointing?
cloud360 said:
In conclusion, am i right to say in every single question like this, the gravity will be -G or -i in polar co ordinates (i.e pointing downwards)
We're not really dealing with polar coordinates here. Everything is occurring along a straight line. Don't think of gravity being negative or positive - focus on the force involved.
cloud360 said:
so in this question should i just add a negative part and explain why i added it?is it that simple, or do i need to do some algebra?
 
  • #13


Mark44 said:
Yes, the only force in this problem is the force due to gravity.
Yes, and that's what I've been trying to get you to realize.
No, I'm talking about the force that is due to gravity. Mass M exerts a force on particle P, but P also exerts a force on M. The force that particle P "feels" is in the direction of O, which is in the direction of negative r. P's velocity is initially in the direction of positive r.

Going back to your first post in this thread, what is force that P feels due to gravitational attraction? Which direction is that force pointing?
We're not really dealing with polar coordinates here. Everything is occurring along a straight line. Don't think of gravity being negative or positive - focus on the force involved.

Why is gravity not always -G in these questions?

also is it only -G, if it is acting against a particle moving in the positive r? would it be +G if the particle was moving with negative r?
 
  • #14


cloud360 said:
Why is gravity not always -G in these questions?

also is it only -G, if it is acting against a particle moving in the positive r? would it be +G if the particle was moving with negative r?

You're focussing on the wrong thing. G is just a constant (and it's positive). Focus on the force and which direction it points.
 
  • #15


Mark44 said:
You're focussing on the wrong thing. G is just a constant (and it's positive). Focus on the force and which direction it points.

so how can i justify adding a negative symbol. should i say

"the gravity is acting in the opposite direction of the particle"

so gravity = Gi, where i is a direction vector which is negative, so we have -G?

gravity would be positive, but -G just indicated the direction of the gravity?

I got my exam in 12 days i really need to know how i can add a negative symbol ASAP
 
  • #16


cloud360 said:
so how can i justify adding a negative symbol. should i say

"the gravity is acting in the opposite direction of the particle"

so gravity = Gi, where i is a direction vector which is negative, so we have -G?

gravity would be positive, but -G just indicated the direction of the gravity?

I got my exam in 12 days i really need to know how i can add a negative symbol ASAP
Forget the unit vectors, and forget -G. This problem is about one dimension.
You have F = ma = mr''

The gravitational pull from M causes P to accelerate in which direction - toward M or away from M?
 
  • #17


Mark44 said:
Forget the unit vectors, and forget -G. This problem is about one dimension.
You have F = ma = mr''

The gravitational pull from M causes P to accelerate in which direction - toward M or away from M?

Accelerates away from M, as it says in question? so what, what's the significance of this?
 
  • #18


No, it doesn't say this. What you posted says that the particle is projected away from M at a speed of u. After the particle is moving at a speed of u, the only force it feels is the gravitational attraction from mass M.

In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?

I'm hoping that you'll get this within the 12 days.
 
  • #19


Mark44 said:
I'm hoping that you'll get this within the 12 days.

i hoper so also, one of the last questions i posted took almost 14 days :)


Mark44 said:
In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?

I'm hoping that you'll get this within the 12 days.

The force is acting in the opposite direction of the vector r. the particle points towards the positive r. so the force points towards the negative r?

the particles acceleration is just in the direction of the vector r? or does the particle orbit the mass M or something.

Thanks again for your time, i really appreciate it
 
  • #20


Mark44 said:
No, it doesn't say this. What you posted says that the particle is projected away from M at a speed of u. After the particle is moving at a speed of u, the only force it feels is the gravitational attraction from mass M.

In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?
cloud360 said:
The force is acting in the opposite direction of the vector r. the particle points towards the positive r. so the force points towards the negative r?
Which direction does r point? What I'm looking for are answers like "toward M" or "away from M."

The particle doesn't point anywhere, but at the start, the particle is moving in the direction of positive r. IOW, away from M. And yes, the attraction force is in the direction of negative r; i.e., toward M.
cloud360 said:
the particles acceleration is just in the direction of the vector r? or does the particle orbit the mass M or something.
No and no. How can the particle's acceleration be in the opposite direction of the force due to gravity?

Also, this problem is strictly one-dimensional. It either moves in a straight line away from mass M, or it moves back in a straight line toward M. There is no orbiting going on.
 
  • #21


Mark44 said:
Mark44 said:
No, it doesn't say this. What you posted says that the particle is projected away from M at a speed of u. After the particle is moving at a speed of u, the only force it feels is the gravitational attraction from mass M.

In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?
Which direction does r point? What I'm looking for are answers like "toward M" or "away from M."

The particle doesn't point anywhere, but at the start, the particle is moving in the direction of positive r. IOW, away from M. And yes, the attraction force is in the direction of negative r; i.e., toward M.
No and no. How can the particle's acceleration be in the opposite direction of the force due to gravity?

Also, this problem is strictly one-dimensional. It either moves in a straight line away from mass M, or it moves back in a straight line toward M. There is no orbiting going on.

So, should i just add a negative symbol, saying gravity points towards M, so we are going backwards, so it points towards the negative M.

Or should i replace the work gravity above with force, if so, which force?
 
  • #22


How about answering my questions? I've asked more or less the same questions three times.

In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?
cloud360 said:
Or should i replace the work gravity above with force, if so, which force?
Yes, talk about the force.

Which force? As far as the particle is concerned, there is only one force.
 
  • #23


Mark44 said:
How about answering my questions? I've asked more or less the same questions three times.

In what direction is the force acting on the particle?
In what direction is the particle's acceleration?
Yes, talk about the force.

Which force? As far as the particle is concerned, there is only one force.

Force is acting in the opposite direction of the particle.

The particles acceleration is in the same direction as r
 
  • #24


cloud360 said:
Force is acting in the opposite direction of the particle.
Please be more precise. There are only two directions in this problem - toward M or away from M.
cloud360 said:
The particles acceleration is in the same direction as r
How can the direction of the particle's acceleration be different from the force applied to the particle? After all, the basic equation is F = ma.

If it seems that these posts go on and on - they do, for the reason that you have very many misconceptions about the physical concepts in this and the other problems you've posted. I keep asking questions in the hopes that you will begin understanding the ideas that are involved in this problem.
 
  • #25


Mark44 said:
Please be more precise. There are only two directions in this problem - toward M or away from M.

How can the direction of the particle's acceleration be different from the force applied to the particle? After all, the basic equation is F = ma.

If it seems that these posts go on and on - they do, for the reason that you have very many misconceptions about the physical concepts in this and the other problems you've posted. I keep asking questions in the hopes that you will begin understanding the ideas that are involved in this problem.

Ok the force moves towards M. but why, is it due to gravity. like how to the moon orbits the Earth due to gravity?

the direction of the particles acceleration is also towards m?

so r''=-r'' ?
 
  • #26


cloud360 said:
Ok the force moves towards M. but why, is it due to gravity. like how to the moon orbits the Earth due to gravity?
Yes, the force on the particle is toward mass M, and this force is due to gravitational attraction by M. Note the mass M also feels of force of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction. The force that M feels is due to gravitational attraction by particle P.
cloud360 said:
the direction of the particles acceleration is also towards m?
Of course. That follows directly from F = ma.
cloud360 said:
so r''=-r'' ?
How can the acceleration equal its own negative?
 
  • #27


Mark44 said:
Yes, the force on the particle is toward mass M, and this force is due to gravitational attraction by M. Note the mass M also feels of force of the same magnitude but in the opposite direction. The force that M feels is due to gravitational attraction by particle P.
Of course. That follows directly from F = ma.
How can the acceleration equal its own negative?

ok so if acceleration is towards m, then accelration is (r'')ȓ. where ȓ is a direction vector which is negative so we have a=-r'' ?

is this how we get a negative?
 
  • #28


We know that F = ma, and that F = mMG/r2, with m being the mass of particle P and M being the mass of the other object.

Since the gravitational force on P is directed towards O, this force and P's acceleration are in the opposite direction of r, hence they are negative.

Therefore mr'' = - MG/r2.

As I said before, this problem is strictly one-dimensional. In one direction quantities are positive; in the other direction they are negative.
 
  • #29


so was i right about a=(r'')ȓ

and that ȓ=negative so a=-r''

due to gravity acceleration points towards M, so ȓ is negative?
 
  • #30


cloud360 said:
so was i right about a=(r'')ȓ
No. This unit vector points in the same direction as r (away from M). The acceleration points the other way.
cloud360 said:
and that ȓ=negative so a=-r''
No, ȓ isn't negative.
cloud360 said:
due to gravity acceleration points towards M, so ȓ is negative?
Acceleration is toward M, yes, but ȓ is a unit vector in the other direction, away from M.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K