How to Determine Phase Difference Between Two Sinusoidal Signals

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The phase difference between two sinusoidal signals can be calculated using the formula $$\theta = \frac{2 \pi}{T} \Delta T$$, where $$\Delta T$$ is the time difference between the signals. In this discussion, both waveforms were determined to have the same period of approximately 6.25 seconds, leading to a calculated phase difference of approximately 0.151 radians when $$\Delta T$$ is 0.15 seconds. The importance of identifying similar zero-crossing points for accurate phase difference measurement was emphasized, as it provides a reliable method for determining $$\Delta T$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sinusoidal waveforms and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of phase difference and angular frequency
  • Knowledge of zero-crossing points in waveforms
  • Basic proficiency in trigonometric functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the phase difference formula in sinusoidal signals
  • Learn about the significance of zero-crossing points in waveform analysis
  • Explore practical applications of phase difference in electrical engineering
  • Investigate the effects of varying $$\Delta T$$ on phase difference calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, signal processing professionals, and anyone interested in the analysis of sinusoidal signals and their phase relationships.

STEMucator
Homework Helper
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I have read that the phase difference between two sinusoidal signals is calculated as follows:

$$\theta = \omega \Delta T = \frac{2 \pi}{T} \Delta T$$

Where ##\Delta T## is the time difference. This formula confuses me as it was derived from nowhere.

I am asked to compute the phase difference between the two waveforms shown:

Screen Shot 2014-10-01 at 4.18.47 PM.png


Also how much does wave 1 lead wave 2?

Homework Equations



$$f = \frac{1}{T}$$
$$\omega = 2 \pi f$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I am confused with the question itself. I know I am merely looking for the phase difference ##|\theta_1 - \theta_2|## between the waves.

Wave 1 appears to be a plain old sin wave (##v_1 = 1*sin(\omega t)##). Wave 2 is lagging behind wave 1 (##v_2 = 2*sin(\omega t + \phi)##).

Is that the right approach? Or do I read the periods of each wave off?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The phase is relative to the wave period ##T##, so you need to figure out both ##T## and ##\Delta T## (as you can see from the equation you posted).
 
olivermsun said:
The phase is relative to the wave period ##T##, so you need to figure out both ##T## and ##\Delta T## (as you can see from the equation you posted).

##T## is what confused me as there are two different periods for each wave. Here's what I have so far:

IMG_0387.jpg
 
olivermsun said:
The phase is relative to the wave period ##T##, so you need to figure out both ##T## and ##\Delta T## (as you can see from the equation you posted).

Sorry for the double, but I think I realized something. Is the period of both waves and not just one roughly 6.25? The time difference would be roughly 0.15.
 
Look closely — I think both waves have the same period ##T##.
 
  • Like
Likes STEMucator
The formula you wondered about comes about from considering ##T## to be the period and ##\Delta T## to be a portion of ##T##. That means ##\Delta T / T## is the fraction of a full cycle of ##2 \pi## radians. So then:
$$\phi = \frac{\Delta T}{T} 2 \pi$$

As near as I can tell both waves have the same period.

One way to do this sort of problem is to identify similar zero-crossing points and use them for the instants of time that you'll be considering. By "similar" I mean where both waves are crossing the zero level in the same direction. Here's your picture with three such crossing points indicated. I've also laid a "ruler" along the zero V axis for convenience.

waves.png


Note that two time differences are indicated, ##T_a## and ##T_b##. One of them is smaller than the other. You generally want to take the smaller one because it will will yield a phase difference less than 180°. But it may make you re-evaluate whether wave 2 is leading or lagging wave 1!

If you are required to consider that wave 1 leads wave 2, then you'll have to live with the larger angular difference in this case.
 
  • Like
Likes STEMucator
olivermsun said:
Look closely — I think both waves have the same period ##T##.

Cool, I now get:

##\theta = \frac{2 \pi}{T} \Delta T = \frac{2 \pi}{6.25} (0.15) = 0.151 rad##
 
I don't see where you're getting the 0.15 second value for ##\Delta T##.
 
gneill said:
I don't see where you're getting the 0.15 second value for ##\Delta T##.

##\Delta T## was not explained. It was only mentioned as the time difference once.

I think that it's the difference between the peaks? So ##\Delta T = 4##.

Then ##\theta = 4.02 rad##.
 
  • #10
Zondrina said:
##\Delta T## was not explained. It was only mentioned as the time difference once.

I think that it's the difference between the peaks? So ##\Delta T = 4##.

Then ##\theta = 4.02 rad##.
It's the difference between any two equivalent points on the waveforms. Peaks are an example. But I find zero crossings can be determined more accurately. That's why I pointed out three choice ones on the figure.
 
  • #11
gneill said:
It's the difference between any two equivalent points on the waveforms. Peaks are an example. But I find zero crossings can be determined more accurately. That's why I pointed out three choice ones on the figure.

Yes I liked your method as well, it actually helped me realize that it was really the difference between two equivalent points.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
10K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
992
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
726