How to determine strong acids when reacting with magnesium?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mbeaumont99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acids Magnesium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on identifying nitric, hydrochloric, and sulfuric acids through their reactions with magnesium, specifically by measuring hydrogen gas production. Sulfuric acid, being diprotic, produces hydrogen gas at a higher rate due to its initial dissociation, while both nitric and hydrochloric acids, as strong monoprotic acids, fully dissociate. The challenge lies in distinguishing between nitric and hydrochloric acids, which may require examining their acid dissociation constants to determine their relative rates of hydrogen gas production. The concentration of all acids is known to be 1 molar, which aids in the analysis. Ultimately, measuring the amount of hydrogen produced can effectively identify the acids.
mbeaumont99
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to design a lab which will determine nitric, hydrochloric and sulfuric acid from containers A, B and C - i.e. It is unknown which acid is held in which container. This has to be done by reacting the unknown acids with magnesium


Homework Equations


Mg + 2H(+) → Mg(2+) + H2


The Attempt at a Solution


So sulfuric acid is a diprotic acid and therefore once it has dissociated its first proton [becoming HSO4(-)] which we can assume happens at 100% effectiveness, the hydrogen sulfate will further dissociate into SO4(2-) but this is a weak acid and therefore only partially dissociates its H(+) ion. This means that my rate of hydrogen gas production will be higher than the other two strong acids (if only marginally) due to a higher concentration of H(+) ions. I assume that hydrogen gas production rate would be my source of determining the acid??

Then comes the problem: how would I be able to see a noticeable difference in nitric acid and hydrochloric acid hydrogen gas production rates? Both are strong, monoprotic acids and therefore we can assume 100% dissociation of their protons. Would we have to refer to acid dissociation constants and therefore be able to say 'x' had a faster rate of hydrogen gas production than 'y' and therefore this means that 'x' is HCl as this has a higher K(a) value and thus will have a greater concentration of H(+) ions at equilibrium than 'y' leading to a greater production of hydrogen gas according to the 'relevant formula'.

Would really appreciate any help that can be contributed. Oh, and I'm new here so please correct me on any little formalities that I should have done/abided to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have not stated if you are given concentrations of these acid. If not - you can't do much.

Nitric acid is relatively easily reduced by evolving hydrogen to ammonia.
 
Apologies Borek. I DID forget to mention that we know the concentration of all the acids are 1 molar solutions.
 
No problem.

If so, combine the information about amount of hydrogen produced and consumed in the reaction mixture. Ammonia dissolves in water pretty well. I guess that should be enough to determine which acid is which.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Back
Top