How to determine the change of resistance from I-V graph?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the change in resistance (R) of a non-ohmic conductor from an I-V graph, the reciprocal of the gradient (dV/dI) is relevant for the section passing through the origin. However, for sections that do not pass through the origin, the gradient only indicates how current (I) changes with voltage (V), not how R changes. The discussion emphasizes that while R can be calculated using R = V/I, understanding the general trend of R requires qualitative analysis of the graph rather than numerical values. It is suggested to look at the graph to identify trends instead of reconstructing data points. Overall, the key is to recognize that resistance in non-linear elements behaves differently and requires careful interpretation of the graph.
morrw1ndy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
b5MsH8l.jpg

0CDaKAm.jpg

1. Homework Statement

How to determine the change of R of a non-ohmic conductor from different parts of I-V graph?
Please see the sketch attached.

Homework Equations


R=V/I

The Attempt at a Solution


For the part that passes through the origin, it is obvious that the reciprocal of the gradient, i.e. dV/dI, shows how R changes.
However, for the upper part(green part), since it does not passes though (0,0), the gradient only shows how I changes with V, but not how R changes with V.
I have tried to sub in numerical values as shown in the second picture, it seems that R varies in different ways even though I-V graph is concaving downwards.
Instead of sketching a separate R-V graph, are there any alternatives to tell the change in R directly from the graph?
Thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • b5MsH8l.jpg
    b5MsH8l.jpg
    60.1 KB · Views: 998
  • 0CDaKAm.jpg
    0CDaKAm.jpg
    16.6 KB · Views: 911
Physics news on Phys.org
morrw1ndy said:
View attachment 231006
View attachment 231007
1. Homework Statement

How to determine the change of R of a non-ohmic conductor from different parts of I-V graph?
Please see the sketch attached.

Homework Equations


R=V/I

The Attempt at a Solution


For the part that passes through the origin, it is obvious that the reciprocal of the gradient, i.e. dV/dI, shows how R changes.
However, for the upper part(green part), since it does not passes though (0,0), the gradient only shows how I changes with V, but not how R changes with V.
I have tried to sub in numerical values as shown in the second picture, it seems that R varies in different ways even though I-V graph is concaving downwards.
Instead of sketching a separate R-V graph, are there any alternatives to tell the change in R directly from the graph?
Thanks a lot.
:welcome:
Hello @morrw1ndy . Welcome to PF !

Is this a homework problem or perhaps a part of some other school assignment?

Can you give some context here?
 
SammyS said:
:welcome:
Hello @morrw1ndy . Welcome to PF !

Is this a homework problem or perhaps a part of some other school assignment?

Can you give some context here?
Hi sir, this is a exam question which I may get the suggested answer 1 month later :)
It is a 2 mark explanation question, so I don't think detailed calculation is needed, and that's why I'm confused :)
 
morrw1ndy said:
Hi I have read through this thread... It seems that they did not arrive at a conclusionon?
Our syllabus makes it clear that R=V/I but not dV/dI.
So go by what your syllabus says and use R = V/I to find the resistance. Since you are asked to find the change in resistance, use ΔR = (V2/I2) - (V1/I1).
 
kuruman said:
So go by what your syllabus says and use R = V/I to find the resistance. Since you are asked to find the change in resistance, use ΔR = (V2/I2) - (V1/I1).
Emm, but the question asks for a greneral trend, so I'm afraid that I won't be able to figure out all the delta V and delta I on the curve though
 
the question asks for a greneral trend, so I'm afraid that I won't be able to figure out all the delta V and delta I on the curve though
Surely you can see the trend by looking at the graph? That's why we draw graphs rather than using a table of data.
It's not clear where your graph came from. It could be drawn by hand from a table of data. It could have been drawn by someone trying to show you the general trend, based simply on their understanding of the physical situation. Maybe it was produced as the output from an electronic 'analyser' of some sort, but that would have been derived from data values from ADCs. In all cases the graph exists only because someone thought it would be easier to understand than the raw data.

So maybe you should not be trying to reconstruct the data from the graph - just look and see.
IMO all this argument about the definition of resistance is futile. You can find any number of examples where people use each of them. What is important here is to understand the physical behaviour of this (type of) element. And to realize that you have to be careful when people talk about resistance of non-linear elements.
 
morrw1ndy said:
Emm, but the question asks for a greneral trend, so I'm afraid that I won't be able to figure out all the delta V and delta I on the curve though
@Merlin3189 hit the nail on the head. If it's a general trend you want, then forget trying to get numbers from the graph. Just look at the sketch and provide a qualitative description of what it's saying to you.
 
  • #10
I = V/R. This suggests that dI/dV = 1/R, and if R is constant, that is true. However, if R is not constant with respect to V, that clearly isn’t true. dI/dV is an interesting quantity, and it is called “differential resistance”, but don’t be fooled by the name. It is not the resistance. Looking at the slope of the graph is the wrong approach. You have a graph of I vs V. If you had a graph of V/I vs V, THEN you could look at the slope.

There are a few ways to approach this question. Graphically R at a point on the graph is the inverse of the slope of a line connecting that point to the origin, and you could reason about dR/dV that way. You could start with what kuruman said and calculate V/I at adjacent points. Or you could argue using calculus. Assume you know some functional form of I as a function of V: I(V). Start with the definition of R: R = V/I(V) and use the chain rule to express dR/dV
 
Back
Top