Engineering How to Determine Voltage and Current in an RLC Circuit?

Click For Summary
To determine voltage and current in an RLC circuit, start by calculating the reactance values, XL and XC, using the given frequency (omega = 100). A Thevenin source transformation can simplify the circuit, converting the voltage source in series with a resistor into a current source in parallel with a resistor. This approach allows for easier analysis of the circuit, particularly since the branches containing R2 and C are in parallel with the branch containing L and R3. Applying KVL and KCL equations will help find the voltages and currents in each branch. Ultimately, using phasors and node voltage equations will yield the desired results for the circuit analysis.
xporten
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I need to find V0
Relevant Equations
Vs=14.14cos(100t)V
Hi
i want to know just how to approach this question.
i know the omega=100 then should i find XL and XC? and then find the voltage in points c and d?
also how do i find the current that enters point c?
142753.png

thanks a lot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know about the Thevenin source transformations? That's where I'd start. The other (harder) approach is to write out the KVL and KCL equations and solve them. Yes you will need Xl and Xc.
 
I would start by doing a source transformation of Vs(t) in series with the 5 ohm resistor and make that into a Vs(t)/5 current with a parallel 5 ohm resistor. This now puts everything in that circuit in parallel simplifying it considerably. I hope you realize that the branch containing R2 and C is in parallel with the branch containing L and R3 and they are all in parallel with Ix. AT that point just do a single node voltage equation with phasors. That will give you the currents and voltages in all the branches. (The current through C is the same as the current through R2 as they are in series, BTW) Once you have the branch currents and voltage drops just do a KVL around either Vo, R2 and L or Vo C and R3.
 
Thread 'Why wasn’t gravity included in the potential energy for this problem?'
I’m looking at the attached vibration problem. The solution in the manual includes the spring potential energy but does NOT include the gravitational potential energy of the hanging mass. Can someone explain why gravitational potential energy is not included when deriving the equation of motion? I tried asking ChatGPT but kept going in circles and couldn't figure out. Thanks!

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
498
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
11K