How to estimate a function that fit well with a curve

AI Thread Summary
To estimate a function that fits a curve well, users are exploring options beyond polynomial functions, particularly for graphs with significant variation. While a fourth-degree polynomial can provide a good fit in Excel, it struggles with steep or flat sections of the curve. Alternatives like LOESS and parametric cubic polynomials (e.g., Bezier curves) are suggested for better results. An Excel add-in with LOESS capabilities is also recommended for easier implementation. Overall, using more flexible fitting methods can yield superior curve approximations.
gibnem
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
hello
somme one know how to get the function that fit well with a curve
following is my curve:
[PLAIN]http://img814.imageshack.us/img814/5885/tempdepth.png

thx..:smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOESS" ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
yeh it could be...

i could create a function that fit very well withe that graph just in excel with a fourth polynomiale and i get the numerical expresion
but withe some other graphe with more variation the polynomiale function don't fit very good so I'm looking if i can found a softwar thar use other methodes (moving average, exp, or a mix of this methodes) to get a better curve fitting)
 
A polynomial is not going to deal well with either the nearly vertical part at high depths, or the nearly horizontal part at low depths. You might be able to fix that with an appropriate coordinate transformation, but a generic method like LOESS will likely produce better results with less effort.
 
Here is a link to an Excel add-in that claims to have LOESS capability.

http://www.fileguru.com/Data-Curve-Fit-Creator-Add-in/download

If I were doing this I'd consider some form of parametric cubic polynomials (e.g. Bezier) because they can handle vertical slopes.
 
Last edited:
oooh thank you hotvette
that give a really a very very good fitting
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top