How to estimate latent heat of polymorphic phase transitions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around estimating the latent heat of first-order polymorphic phase transitions, specifically focusing on the transition between cubic-diamond and beta-tin phases of crystalline silicon. Participants explore methods to derive this value from first principles, rather than relying solely on classical thermodynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Gabriele questions whether the latent heat can be estimated from first principles by considering interatomic forces, rather than using classical thermodynamic formulas.
  • One participant explains that latent heat can be expressed as L = TΔS, where ΔS is the difference in entropy, and suggests calculating ΔU using ensemble averages in the NPT ensemble via Monte-Carlo simulations.
  • Gabriele expresses a desire to estimate latent heat independently from the formula L = TΔS to calculate transition pressure, noting the challenge of applying classical expressions under non-hydrostatic stress conditions.
  • Another participant raises concerns about the lack of references explaining the physical origin of latent heat in solid-solid phase transitions, contrasting it with the more straightforward explanation for latent heat of vaporization.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to estimate latent heat from first principles, and multiple competing views on the methodology and theoretical underpinnings remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the applicability of classical thermodynamic expressions under non-hydrostatic stress, and the discussion highlights the need for a clearer understanding of the microscopic mechanisms involved in solid-solid phase transitions.

g_mogni
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I know that the latent heat of a first-order isothermal and isobaric phase transition is in general given by the difference in enthalpies between the two phases, but my question is: do you know if there is there a way to estimate its value "from first principles" for the case of a first-order polymorphic solid-solid structural phase transition (say the transition from the cubic-diamond and beta-tin phases of crystalline silicon)? By first principles I mean not resorting to classical thermodynamics, but considering for example the difference in interatomic forces between the two phases. Any insight on this would be greatly appreciated!

Gabriele
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
Hi Gabriele,

The latent heat L = TΔS , where ΔS is the difference in entropy between the two phases. At constant volume, ΔS = -ΔU/T where ΔU is the difference in internal energy between the two phases (this can be derived from the thermodynamic differential dU = PdV - TdS). So to compute the latent heat, you need to compute ΔU.

Now, how to compute ΔU? You need to compute the ensemble average - in your case in the NPT ensemble - of the Hamiltonian for both phases, and subtract one from the other. The usual approach to doing this is Monte-Carlo simulation (Metropolis method), see e.g. the books 'Computer Simulation of Liquids' by Allen and Tildesley and 'Understanding Molecular Simulation' by Frenkel and Smit for a good description of this. These books are really for classical force fields, the formalism is basically identical for quantum systems as well but the practical methods for actually computing ensemble averages would be different (more difficult) in that case.

ps: I am not quite sure what you mean by "considering for example the difference in interatomic forces between the two phases". The interatomic forces are what they are (or, more likely, what your simplified model of the forces say they are). It probably wouldn't be sensible to compute two internal energies with different force field descriptions. If you did, it would be non-trivial to relate the two internal energies, and hence compute an accurate ΔU value.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, thanks for your help. The issue here is that I would like to be able to estimate the latent heat independently from the formula L=TΔS. The reason is that I would like to be able to calculate the transition pressure for a first-order polymorphic phase transition of crystalline silicon, and for that I need to come up with independent estimates for each of L and the TΔS terms (such that at the transition pressure the two terms are equal). I already have a method for calculating the entropy from phonon frequencies. In the normal case of a isothermal and isobaric phase transition under hydrostatic stress, the latent heat would normally be given by the difference in enthalpies of the two phases ΔU+pΔV, such that the equation L=TΔS (which is valid at the transition pressure) reduces to the equivalence of the gibbs free energies G=U+pV-TS of the two phases, i.e. the conventional way of finding the transition pressure. The problem is that the expression ΔU+pΔV for the latent heat is only valid under hydrostatic stress. For non-hydrostatic stress, which is the case I would like to study, there isn't an obvious expression for the enthalpy. Hence why I was wondering if maybe there was a way of estimating the latent heat based on microscopic statistical mechanics considerations on the difference between the structures of the two phases, and not on classical thermodynamics. Hope I have been clear enough.

Many thanks for your help,

Gabriele
 
The problem is that I can't find any reference that explain the physical origin of latent heat of first-order polymorphic phase transitions in crystals. In the case of latent heat of vaporisation, it can be easily explained in terms of the energy required to break all the bonds in the liquid phase, but it is not obvious to me what the equivalent explanation is for the case of solid-solid phase transitions in crystals...

G
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
19K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K