I How to Experimentally Measure the MTF of a Lens?

Click For Summary
To experimentally measure the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of a lens, the focus should be on measuring the Contrast Transfer Function (CTF) instead, as it accounts for the sampled nature of imaging systems. A practical approach involves printing black-and-white bars with equal widths and varying spacings, then capturing images to analyze the normalized contrast as a function of line pair spacing. This method allows for assessing optical performance across the image area and identifying aberrations. An alternative technique involves imaging a sharp black-white transition and applying a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to derive the CTF from the pixel data. For in-depth understanding, resources like "Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems" by Vollmerhausen and Driggers are recommended.
Gifty01
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
MTF
Hi all, I will like to measure the MTF of a lens experimentally. In the set-up, I have my light - target - lens - camera. When my object (target) is at the focus of the lens, I took an image.

My question now is, to I move my object across one pixel or few pixels or to move my object across several pixels ( If I move across several pixels, I obtain a defocused image) Therefore, what is the best way to do this experimentally. Thanks in advance
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not to come off as totally pedantic, but measuring the MTF is really hard and time-consuming because it's a complex-valued quantity. What you actually want to measure isn't even the the modulus of the MTF (the optical transfer function), but the "contrast transfer function" (CTF) because you have a sampled imaging system and not a continuous detector like film.

Measuring the CTF is fairly straightforward- print out a set of black-and-white bars, with the separation distance equal to 2x the bar width (so the black and white sections have equal width). Do this for a range of "line pair" spacings. At some point, you will need to convert the actual line pair spacing (say, 0.5 lp/mm) to line pairs/pixel, but that conversion will depend on your setup.

Then, simply image the target- the (normalized) contrast of your image as a function of line pair spacing is equal to the CTF. You can do this over the image area to compare the optical performance near the optical axis to the optical performance at the edge of the frame, determine the effect of stopping down the aperture, determine aberrations like astigmatism (by rotating the bars 90 degrees), etc. etc.

There's a clever alternative method you can use with a single image, taking advantage of the relations between the transfer function and point spread function, edge spread function, and line spread function- simply image an abrupt black-white transition and perform an FFT on the image pixel data normal to the transition. The FFT of that data is the CTF.

For hard-core details that covers sampled imaging systems including aberrations like aliasing, I recommend Vollmerhausen and Driggers "Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems" (SPIE press).

Does that help?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Ibix and Bandersnatch
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
15K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K