I How to Experimentally Measure the MTF of a Lens?

AI Thread Summary
To experimentally measure the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) of a lens, the focus should be on measuring the Contrast Transfer Function (CTF) instead, as it accounts for the sampled nature of imaging systems. A practical approach involves printing black-and-white bars with equal widths and varying spacings, then capturing images to analyze the normalized contrast as a function of line pair spacing. This method allows for assessing optical performance across the image area and identifying aberrations. An alternative technique involves imaging a sharp black-white transition and applying a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to derive the CTF from the pixel data. For in-depth understanding, resources like "Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems" by Vollmerhausen and Driggers are recommended.
Gifty01
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
MTF
Hi all, I will like to measure the MTF of a lens experimentally. In the set-up, I have my light - target - lens - camera. When my object (target) is at the focus of the lens, I took an image.

My question now is, to I move my object across one pixel or few pixels or to move my object across several pixels ( If I move across several pixels, I obtain a defocused image) Therefore, what is the best way to do this experimentally. Thanks in advance
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Not to come off as totally pedantic, but measuring the MTF is really hard and time-consuming because it's a complex-valued quantity. What you actually want to measure isn't even the the modulus of the MTF (the optical transfer function), but the "contrast transfer function" (CTF) because you have a sampled imaging system and not a continuous detector like film.

Measuring the CTF is fairly straightforward- print out a set of black-and-white bars, with the separation distance equal to 2x the bar width (so the black and white sections have equal width). Do this for a range of "line pair" spacings. At some point, you will need to convert the actual line pair spacing (say, 0.5 lp/mm) to line pairs/pixel, but that conversion will depend on your setup.

Then, simply image the target- the (normalized) contrast of your image as a function of line pair spacing is equal to the CTF. You can do this over the image area to compare the optical performance near the optical axis to the optical performance at the edge of the frame, determine the effect of stopping down the aperture, determine aberrations like astigmatism (by rotating the bars 90 degrees), etc. etc.

There's a clever alternative method you can use with a single image, taking advantage of the relations between the transfer function and point spread function, edge spread function, and line spread function- simply image an abrupt black-white transition and perform an FFT on the image pixel data normal to the transition. The FFT of that data is the CTF.

For hard-core details that covers sampled imaging systems including aberrations like aliasing, I recommend Vollmerhausen and Driggers "Analysis of Sampled Imaging Systems" (SPIE press).

Does that help?
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes berkeman, Ibix and Bandersnatch
3I/ATLAS, also known as C/2025 N1 (ATLAS) and formerly designated as A11pl3Z, is an iinterstellar comet. It was discovered by the Asteroid Terrestrial-impact Last Alert System (ATLAS) station at Río Hurtado, Chile on 1 July 2025. Note: it was mentioned (as A11pl3Z) by DaveE in a new member's introductory thread. https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/brian-cox-lead-me-here.1081670/post-7274146 https://earthsky.org/space/new-interstellar-object-candidate-heading-toward-the-sun-a11pl3z/ One...
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...

Similar threads

Back
Top