How to explain the mass deffect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mahela007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain Mass
mahela007
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I understand that when , say, several protons and neutron come together to from a nucleus they loose some mass and that this mass is lost as ENERGY as proven by Einstein. But does that actually mean that the protons and neutrons become a bit lighter? And is this what accounts for the mass defect (i.e why the relative atomic mass of any atom except C12 is not a whole number)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

You are exactly right. The protons and neutrons, in an atomic nucleus become a bit lighter. This also explains your example with the C12 atom and many other.

By the way, as long as the nucleus is whole, the protons ans neutrons will be a little lighter. This mass defect is transformed into binding energy (energy that glues them together). This energy is the effect of the strong nuclear interaction.

Cheers
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top