How to express this statement using quantifiers

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rasen58
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the correct expression of the statement "There is a real number between any two real numbers" using quantifiers. The first formulation, "For all y and z, there exists some x such that y < x < z," is deemed correct when the assumption y < z is included. The second formulation, "There exists such an x such that for all y and z, y < x < z," is incorrect as it implies a single x exists for all pairs of y and z, which is not feasible. The key takeaway is the necessity of the assumption y < z for accurate representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with mathematical quantifiers (universal and existential)
  • Basic knowledge of inequalities
  • Concept of dependencies in mathematical statements
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of quantifiers in mathematical logic
  • Explore the properties of real numbers in depth
  • Learn about the role of assumptions in mathematical proofs
  • Investigate common misconceptions in mathematical inequalities
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in formal logic and the foundations of real analysis.

rasen58
Messages
71
Reaction score
2
There is a real number between any other two real numbers.
I have two ways of writing it
For all y and z there is some x such that y < x < z
OR
There is such an x such that for all y and z, y < x < z

I'm confused as to which one is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
None of them is fully correct, you must add the assumption that y < z, otherwise there would be a number x such that e.g. 2 < x < 1.

If you add this assumption, the first one is correct, because x depends on y and z. If the second was correct, there would be an x which lies between any numbers y and z such that y < z, so there would be an x such that 0 < x < 1, 1 < x < 2, 55 < x < 971 etc. i.e. the same x would work for all y and z such that y < z.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: rasen58
Thank you! That makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K