MHB How to Find \(a^2\) from a Matrix Inverse Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Click For Summary
To find \(a^2\) from the matrix inverse equation, the discussion revolves around determining the conditions under which the matrix \[\begin{pmatrix} 1 & a \\ 2a & 1 \end{pmatrix}\]is singular. The key point is that for the matrix to be singular, its determinant must be zero, which leads to the equations derived from the linear dependence of its columns. The participants emphasize the importance of finding values of \(a\) that make the matrix non-invertible, ultimately leading to a solvable equation for \(a^2\). The conversation also touches on the relevance of the "17th power" in the context of the problem, although it is deemed unnecessary for the solution. The final goal is to express \(a^2\) in terms of the derived equations.
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have another question regarding inverse matrices. I need to find

\[a^{2}\]

given:

\[\exists x: \begin{pmatrix} 1 &a \\ 2a &1 \end{pmatrix}^{2}\cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ x \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\]

Any hints or guidance will be appreciated !

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some random thoughts that occurs to me:

We can see that the matrix:

$\begin{bmatrix}1&2a\\a&1 \end{bmatrix}^2$

is singular. Let's call this matrix $M^2$.

Convince yourself that if $M$ is invertible, so is $M^2$. Since $M^2$ is singular, then, so must $M$ be. Under what conditions will $M$ be singular?
 
not sure I follow you

what makes you think it is singular ? I ran an example setting a=2 on Maple and there was an inverse...

if they tell me there exist x such that...is it right to say that there exist x that solves this linear equation system, meaning that the matrix is invertible ? saying that, is it correct to say that rank of this matrix must equal 2, and that what I need to do here is to find the values of a that gives me that ? If I am correct, I know WHAT to do, but not HOW to do, because of the 17th power up there.
 
There are lots of "equivalent" definitions of a singular matrix:

1) A matrix that is not invertible.
2) A matrix $A$ for which there exists some other matrix $B \neq 0$ with $AB = 0$.
3) A matrix $A$ for which there exists some non-zero vector $v$ such that $Av = 0$.
4) A matrix with zero determinant.

It should be clear that definition #3 is easiest to apply, here: since the vector $(1,x)^T$ is non-zero, no matter "what" $x$ may be.

Yes, for SOME values of $a$, the matrix $M$ WILL be invertible. You are not interested in those values, you are interested in the values for which $M$ will NOT be invertible (Hint: look at definition #4).
 
basically I am not suppose to use determinants for this one...

I understand what you mean now, for why seeking for values of a for which the matrix is NOT invertible. How should I find them if I have a 17th power - this I am yet to realize
 
Not using determinants seems an onerous restriction, as it truly is the most elegant way in this case.

I do not see why you keep mentioning the "17th power" it truly does not seem relevant.

I forgot the mention a 5th equivalent definition of a singular matrix:

One whose columns form a linearly dependent set.

If we apply THIS definition, we must have:

$(2a,1) = (k,ka)$ for some field element (real number? rational? complex? you do not say...) $k$.

Since by direct substitution we see $a = 0$ does not work, we may assume $a \neq 0$.

This leads to the two equations:

$2a = k$
$1 = ka$

That is:

$k = \dfrac{1}{a} = 2a$.

This last equation can be solved for $a^2$.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K