MHB How to Find \(a^2\) from a Matrix Inverse Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Matrix
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have another question regarding inverse matrices. I need to find

\[a^{2}\]

given:

\[\exists x: \begin{pmatrix} 1 &a \\ 2a &1 \end{pmatrix}^{2}\cdot \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ x \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\]

Any hints or guidance will be appreciated !

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some random thoughts that occurs to me:

We can see that the matrix:

$\begin{bmatrix}1&2a\\a&1 \end{bmatrix}^2$

is singular. Let's call this matrix $M^2$.

Convince yourself that if $M$ is invertible, so is $M^2$. Since $M^2$ is singular, then, so must $M$ be. Under what conditions will $M$ be singular?
 
not sure I follow you

what makes you think it is singular ? I ran an example setting a=2 on Maple and there was an inverse...

if they tell me there exist x such that...is it right to say that there exist x that solves this linear equation system, meaning that the matrix is invertible ? saying that, is it correct to say that rank of this matrix must equal 2, and that what I need to do here is to find the values of a that gives me that ? If I am correct, I know WHAT to do, but not HOW to do, because of the 17th power up there.
 
There are lots of "equivalent" definitions of a singular matrix:

1) A matrix that is not invertible.
2) A matrix $A$ for which there exists some other matrix $B \neq 0$ with $AB = 0$.
3) A matrix $A$ for which there exists some non-zero vector $v$ such that $Av = 0$.
4) A matrix with zero determinant.

It should be clear that definition #3 is easiest to apply, here: since the vector $(1,x)^T$ is non-zero, no matter "what" $x$ may be.

Yes, for SOME values of $a$, the matrix $M$ WILL be invertible. You are not interested in those values, you are interested in the values for which $M$ will NOT be invertible (Hint: look at definition #4).
 
basically I am not suppose to use determinants for this one...

I understand what you mean now, for why seeking for values of a for which the matrix is NOT invertible. How should I find them if I have a 17th power - this I am yet to realize
 
Not using determinants seems an onerous restriction, as it truly is the most elegant way in this case.

I do not see why you keep mentioning the "17th power" it truly does not seem relevant.

I forgot the mention a 5th equivalent definition of a singular matrix:

One whose columns form a linearly dependent set.

If we apply THIS definition, we must have:

$(2a,1) = (k,ka)$ for some field element (real number? rational? complex? you do not say...) $k$.

Since by direct substitution we see $a = 0$ does not work, we may assume $a \neq 0$.

This leads to the two equations:

$2a = k$
$1 = ka$

That is:

$k = \dfrac{1}{a} = 2a$.

This last equation can be solved for $a^2$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K