How to find a polynomial from an algebraic number?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guysensei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomial
AI Thread Summary
To find a polynomial with integer coefficients that has an algebraic number like √2+√3+√5 as a root, one can use techniques involving the manipulation of expressions and identities. The discussion highlights methods for simplifying complex algebraic numbers by eliminating surds through repeated application of algebraic identities. For instance, using the identity (b - a)(b + a) = b^2 - a^2 can help in constructing polynomials step by step. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the final polynomial has integer coefficients and addresses potential mistakes in calculations. Ultimately, the correct polynomial can be confirmed through computational tools like Wolfram Alpha.
guysensei1
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Given some algebraic number, let's say, √2+√3+√5, or 2^(1/3)+√2, is there some way to find the polynomial that will give 0 when that number is substituted in? I know that there are methods to find the polynomial for some of the simpler numbers like √2+√3, but I have no clue where to begin for the more complex ones like the 2 I listed above.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Do you impose any restirictions on the polynomial you are looking for? The way you stated your problem P(x)=x-a where a is your number will do. Or even P(x)=0. I guess that's not what you were looking for though, so you need to make your question more precise.
Remember that every polynomial s.t.: P(a)=0 has form P(x)=(x-a)*Q(x) where Q is another polynomial. So you can start by writing it that way and thinking what Q do you need for your polynomial to do the job. My guess is that you want to restrict yourself only to polynomial with integer coefficients, which is hinted by the fact that you explicitly stated that zeroes are algebraic. In this case Viete formulas might help you.
 
Blazejr said:
Do you impose any restirictions on the polynomial you are looking for? The way you stated your problem P(x)=x-a where a is your number will do. Or even P(x)=0. I guess that's not what you were looking for though, so you need to make your question more precise.

Gah, I should have said that all the coefficients must be integers, and P(x)=0 is not allowed. :P
 
guysensei1 said:
Given some algebraic number, let's say, √2+√3+√5, or 2^(1/3)+√2, is there some way to find the polynomial that will give 0 when that number is substituted in? I know that there are methods to find the polynomial for some of the simpler numbers like √2+√3, but I have no clue where to begin for the more complex ones like the 2 I listed above.

Repeated use of (b - a)(b + a) = b^2 - a^2 helps. Thus with b = x - \sqrt 2 - \sqrt 3 and a = \sqrt 5 we obtain (x - \sqrt 2 - \sqrt 3 - \sqrt 5)(x - \sqrt 2 - \sqrt 3 + \sqrt 5) = x^2 - 2(\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3)x + 2\sqrt 6 = p(x) and the \sqrt 5 is gone. Now using the same trick with b = x^2 + 2\sqrt 6 and a = 2(\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3) (I make this choice because (\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3)^2 = 5 + 2\sqrt 6 and I already have a \sqrt 6 anyway) yields<br /> q(x) = p(x)(x^2 + 2\sqrt 6 + 2(\sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3)x) = x^4 - 8\sqrt 6 x^2 - 20x^2 + 24 and only the \sqrt{6} remains. Applying the trick once more yields<br /> r(x) = q(x)(x^4 - 20x^2 + 24 + 8\sqrt{6}x^2) = (x^4 - 20x^2 + 24)^2 - 384x^4<br /> and all the surds are gone.

Similarly, for 2^{1/2} + 2^{1/3} one can make use of b^3 - a^3 = (b - a)(b^2 + ab + a^2) by setting b = x - \sqrt 2 and a = 2^{1/3}: <br /> (x - \sqrt 2 - 2^{1/3})((x - \sqrt{2})^2 + 2^{1/3}(x - \sqrt 2) + 2^{2/3})<br /> = (x - \sqrt{2})^3 - 2. (Alternatively one can observe that (\sqrt 2 + 2^{1/3} - \sqrt 2)^3 = 2.) Working what one should multiply (x - \sqrt{2})^3 - 2 by to obtain a polynomial with integer coefficients I leave as an exercise.
 
pasmith said:
<br /> r(x) = q(x)(x^4 - 20x^2 + 24 + 8\sqrt{6}x^2) = (x^4 - 20x^2 + 24)^2 - 384x^4<br />

This equation (when equated to 0) does not have √2+√3+√5 as a root. I think there's a mistake, but I can't find it.
 
guysensei1 said:
This equation (when equated to 0) does not have √2+√3+√5 as a root. I think there's a mistake, but I can't find it.

It should be (x^4 - 20x^2 + 24)^2 - 96x^4, on account of the fact that (4\sqrt{6})^2 = 96, not 384.

(Woolfram alpha confirms that \sqrt 2 + \sqrt 3 + \sqrt 5 is a root.)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top