MHB How to find angles of a triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To find angles B and C in triangle ABC given angle A as $$\alpha$$ and side $$a=\frac{b+c}{2}$$, the relationship $$\alpha=\pi-B-C$$ is crucial. The cosine theorem can express side a in terms of b, c, and $$\alpha$$, leading to a system of equations with two unknowns. The sine theorem helps derive the ratio $$\frac{b}{c}$$, which can be substituted back into the equations. The angle bisector of angle A also plays a significant role in determining the segments of side a. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of solving these equations but provides a pathway to derive angles B and C.
Andrei1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
We know that in triangle ABC angle A equals $$\alpha$$ and side $$a=\frac{b+c}{2}.$$ How to find angles B and C knowing that $$B\geqslant C$$? For which values of $$\alpha$$ the problem has solutions?

ps. a, b, c are only notations.

answer. $$\frac{\pi-\alpha}{2}\pm\arccos(2\sin\frac{\alpha}{2})$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

It seems you have given $\alpha$ in terms of $\alpha$.
 
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

Here is what I do. I express a through b, c and $$\alpha$$ by cosine theorem. So I have an equation with only b and c as unknown. I obtain $$\frac{b}{c}$$ by sine theorem and I substitute this ratio in the first equation. I also know that $$\alpha=\pi-B-C.$$ So I have two equations with two unknowns. But it is hard to solve.

I also noticed that the bisector of angle A divide side a in two segments: b/2 and c/2.
 
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

Andrei said:
Here is what I do. I express a through b, c and $$\alpha$$ by cosine theorem. So I have an equation with only b and c as unknown. I obtain $$\frac{b}{c}$$ by sine theorem and I substitute this ratio in the first equation. I also know that $$\alpha=\pi-B-C.$$ So I have two equations with two unknowns. But it is hard to solve.

I also noticed that the bisector of angle A divide side a in two segments: b/2 and c/2.
I think you are nearly there. Look at this picture, in which $AD$ is the angle bisector at $A$, and $BN$ is perpendicular to $AD$:

ABCDN.gif


The angle at $B$ is obviously $\angle ABN + \angle NBD$. Equally obviously, $\angle ABN = \frac{\pi}2 - \frac\alpha2$, so we just need to show that $\cos(\angle NBD) = 2\sin\bigl(\frac\alpha2\bigr)$. But $\cos(\angle NBD) = \frac{BN}{BD}$, and you have already shown that $BD = c/2$, so you just need to observe that $BN = c\sin\bigl(\frac\alpha2\bigr)$, which is evident from the triangle $ABN$.

You can get the result for the angle at $C$ in a similar way by dropping a perpendicular from $C$ to the extension of $AD$.​
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top