MHB How to find angles of a triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter Andrei1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Triangle
AI Thread Summary
To find angles B and C in triangle ABC given angle A as $$\alpha$$ and side $$a=\frac{b+c}{2}$$, the relationship $$\alpha=\pi-B-C$$ is crucial. The cosine theorem can express side a in terms of b, c, and $$\alpha$$, leading to a system of equations with two unknowns. The sine theorem helps derive the ratio $$\frac{b}{c}$$, which can be substituted back into the equations. The angle bisector of angle A also plays a significant role in determining the segments of side a. The discussion emphasizes the complexity of solving these equations but provides a pathway to derive angles B and C.
Andrei1
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
We know that in triangle ABC angle A equals $$\alpha$$ and side $$a=\frac{b+c}{2}.$$ How to find angles B and C knowing that $$B\geqslant C$$? For which values of $$\alpha$$ the problem has solutions?

ps. a, b, c are only notations.

answer. $$\frac{\pi-\alpha}{2}\pm\arccos(2\sin\frac{\alpha}{2})$$
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

It seems you have given $\alpha$ in terms of $\alpha$.
 
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

Here is what I do. I express a through b, c and $$\alpha$$ by cosine theorem. So I have an equation with only b and c as unknown. I obtain $$\frac{b}{c}$$ by sine theorem and I substitute this ratio in the first equation. I also know that $$\alpha=\pi-B-C.$$ So I have two equations with two unknowns. But it is hard to solve.

I also noticed that the bisector of angle A divide side a in two segments: b/2 and c/2.
 
Re: how to find angles of a triangle

Andrei said:
Here is what I do. I express a through b, c and $$\alpha$$ by cosine theorem. So I have an equation with only b and c as unknown. I obtain $$\frac{b}{c}$$ by sine theorem and I substitute this ratio in the first equation. I also know that $$\alpha=\pi-B-C.$$ So I have two equations with two unknowns. But it is hard to solve.

I also noticed that the bisector of angle A divide side a in two segments: b/2 and c/2.
I think you are nearly there. Look at this picture, in which $AD$ is the angle bisector at $A$, and $BN$ is perpendicular to $AD$:

ABCDN.gif


The angle at $B$ is obviously $\angle ABN + \angle NBD$. Equally obviously, $\angle ABN = \frac{\pi}2 - \frac\alpha2$, so we just need to show that $\cos(\angle NBD) = 2\sin\bigl(\frac\alpha2\bigr)$. But $\cos(\angle NBD) = \frac{BN}{BD}$, and you have already shown that $BD = c/2$, so you just need to observe that $BN = c\sin\bigl(\frac\alpha2\bigr)$, which is evident from the triangle $ABN$.

You can get the result for the angle at $C$ in a similar way by dropping a perpendicular from $C$ to the extension of $AD$.​
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top