How to find any naked-eye object

  • Thread starter Thread starter eZipSky
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
A new free naked-eye astronomy search engine, ezipsky.com, allows users to find celestial objects by entering their zip code and the object's name, providing real-time visibility instructions. The service can also be accessed via text messaging by sending a specific format to a designated number. Currently in beta, the platform supports a wide range of celestial objects, including planets, stars, and satellites, although users must specify satellite names or designations for accurate results. Some users have reported issues with the help command, which is being updated. The service is currently limited to users in the USA due to postal database restrictions.
eZipSky
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

We just started a free naked-eye astronomy search engine at http://ezipsky.com" . The way it works is that you can enter your zip code and an object in the night sky (e.g. 'mars') to get instructions for where to look to find it in the night sky from your location (if the object is currently visible), calculated in real time.

The really cool thing is that you can also use it for free with cell phone text messaging, by texting 'ezipsky <your zip code> <object>' to 368266 (DOTCOM). The SkyEngine supports pretty much everything we can think of: the planets, constellations, the brightest 150 stars, the brightest 120 satellites, the International Space Station, the hubble, and other stuff.

The sky engine is in beta right now, so any feedback from astronomers would be greatly appreciated (especially for objects we're missing!)

Thanks!

-Peter
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Interesting. I'll test it out tonight. Assuming its a clear night and light pollution doesn't ruin it (as it usually does).
 
I tried my zip code + "satellite" hoping to get a list of which of the 120 brightest satellites I could see tonight, but it did not work. It told me to type "help satellite" but the help page was for a more general topic.

Do I need to type in the satellite name or designation? It would be nice if I didn't.
 
tony873004 said:
I tried my zip code + "satellite" hoping to get a list of which of the 120 brightest satellites I could see tonight, but it did not work. It told me to type "help satellite" but the help page was for a more general topic.

Do I need to type in the satellite name or designation? It would be nice if I didn't.

The "help satellite" command was broken, but is now fixed. Our help page is out of date and will be updated by this evening, tomorrow at the latest. I just tested the service with my zipcode + satellite, and it returned to me the next visible satellite:
Next OAO 3 (COPERNICUS) (NORAD 06153) visibility is tonight. Look for it at 21:05 rising due W. Reaches max elevation 43 deg above horizon due S at 21:13. Follow until it enters Earth's shadow at 21:18, 9 deg above horizon due ESE.

For specific satellites, yes you need the individual name or norad number. I believe many of the major satellites will be added to a keyword list in the help topic tonight.
 
So this is only for people in USA? Disappointing.
 
Most countries charge for their postal database (to map zip/postal codes into Lat/Long) but there are lots of skymap programs/ websites / screensavers that will work from either a city or your lat/long.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Back
Top